Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37075507›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2023

Thinking versus feeling: How interoception and cognition influence emotion recognition in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease.

Jessica L Hazelton, Sol Fittipaldi, Matias Fraile-Vazquez, Marion Sourty, Agustina Legaz, Anna L Hudson, Indira Garcia Cordero, Paula C Salamone, Adrian Yoris, Agustín Ibañez and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Coding Logic of Interoception.Annual review of physiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jessica L HazeltonThe University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Brain & Mind Centre, Sydney, Australia.
Sol FittipaldiCognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC) Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina; Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.
Matias Fraile-VazquezCognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC) Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marion SourtyThe University of Sydney, Brain & Mind Centre, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, School of Engineering, Sydney, Australia.
Agustina LegazCognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC) Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.
Anna L HudsonFlinders University, College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, Australia; Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, Australia; The University of New South Wales, School of Medical Sciences, Sydney, Australia.
Indira Garcia CorderoCognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC) Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Paula C SalamoneNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Adrian YorisNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Agustín IbañezCognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC) Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, USA; Trinity College Dublin (TCD), Dublin, Ireland.
Olivier PiguetThe University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Brain & Mind Centre, Sydney, Australia.
Fiona KumforThe University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Brain & Mind Centre, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: fiona.kumfor@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

US-South American Initiative for Genetic-Neural-Behavioral Interactions in Human Neurodegenerative ResearchR01AG057234 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Claudia Duran-Aniotz, Agustin M. Ibanez · 2019 to 2026
$6.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease-specific mechanisms underlying emotion recognition difficulties in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and Parkinson's disease (PD) are unknown. Interoceptive accuracy, accurately detecting internal cues (e.g., one's heart beating), and cognitive abilities are candidate mechanisms underlying emotion recognition. One hundred and sixty-eight participants (52 bvFTD; 41 AD; 24 PD; 51 controls) were recruited. Emotion recognition was measured via the Facial Affect Selection Task or the Mini-Social and Emotional Assessment Emotion Recognition Task. Interoception was assessed with a heartbeat detection task. Participants pressed a button each time they: 1) felt their heartbeat (Interoception); or 2) heard a recorded heartbeat (Exteroception-control). Cognition was measured via the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III or the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Voxel-based morphometry analyses identified neural correlates associated with emotion recognition and interoceptive accuracy. All patient groups showed worse emotion recognition and cognition than controls (all P's ≤ .008). Only the bvFTD showed worse interoceptive accuracy than controls (P < .001). Regression analyses revealed that in bvFTD worse interoceptive accuracy predicted worse emotion recognition (P = .008). Whereas worse cognition predicted worse emotion recognition overall (P < .001). Neuroimaging analyses revealed that the insula, orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala were involved in emotion recognition and interoceptive accuracy in bvFTD. Here, we provide evidence for disease-specific mechanisms for emotion recognition difficulties. In bvFTD, emotion recognition impairment is driven by inaccurate perception of the internal milieu. Whereas, in AD and PD, cognitive impairment likely underlies emotion recognition deficits. The current study furthers our theoretical understanding of emotion and highlights the need for targeted interventions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseFrontotemporal DementiaInteroceptionParkinson DiseaseCognitionEmotionsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuropsychological TestsBehavioural-variant frontotemporal dementiaEmotionInsulaInteroceptionSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID37075507
PMCPMC11177281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.