Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37075454›Full record

Trial reportRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2023

Efficacy and safety of Ixekizumab vs. low-dose IL-2 vs. Colchicine vs. standard of care in the treatment of patients hospitalized with moderate-to-critical COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical trial (STRUCK: Survival Trial Using Cytokine Inhibitors).

Lívia Pimenta Bonifácio, Eduardo Ramacciotti, Leandro Barile Agati, Fernando Crivelenti Vilar, Anna Christina Tojal da Silva, Paulo Louzada Júnior, Benedito Antônio Lopes da Fonseca, Hayala Cristina Cavenague de Souza, Caroline Candida Carvalho de Oliveira, Valéria Cristina Resende Aguiar and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lívia Pimenta BonifácioUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4309-0304
Eduardo RamacciottiScience Valley Research Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-1333
Fernando Crivelenti VilarUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8232-5375
Anna Christina Tojal da SilvaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8672-4453
Paulo Louzada JúniorUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2585-3870
Benedito Antônio Lopes da FonsecaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-5687
Hayala Cristina Cavenague de SouzaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7970-5403
Caroline Candida Carvalho de OliveiraScience Valley Research Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3588-3370
Valéria Cristina Resende AguiarScience Valley Research Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9950-0415
Carlos Augusto de Aguiar QuadrosGrupo Leforte, Hospital e Maternidade Christóvão da Gama, Santo André, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2098-0706
Cesar DusilekHospital do Rocio, Campo Largo, PR, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6243-8855
Kengi ItinoseHospital do Rocio, Campo Largo, PR, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-0294
Ricardo RissonHospital do Rocio, Campo Largo, PR, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5583-6408
Lucas Roberto Rivabem FerreiraHospital do Rocio, Campo Largo, PR, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6049-7503
Renato Delascio LopesBrazilian Clinical Research Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2999-4961
Esper Georges KallasUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas e Parasitárias, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2026-6925
Fernando Bellissimo-RodriguesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3736-7127
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRHospital Leforte · BRClinical Research Institute · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRZero to Three · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring hospitalization continue to appear in vulnerable populations, highlighting the importance of novel treatments. The hyperinflammatory response underlies the severity of the disease, and targeting this pathway may be useful. Herein, we tested whether immunomodulation focusing on interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17, and IL-2, could improve the clinical outcomes of patients admitted with COVID-19.

methodsThis multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in Brazil. Sixty hospitalized patients with moderate-to-critical COVID-19 received in addition to standard of care (SOC): IL-17 inhibitor (ixekizumab 80 mg SC/week) 1 dose every 4 weeks; low-dose IL-2 (1.5 million IU per day) for 7 days or until discharge; or indirect IL-6 inhibitor (colchicine) orally (0.5 mg) every 8 hours for 3 days, followed by 4 weeks at 0.5 mg 2x/day; or SOC alone. The primary outcome was accessed in the "per protocol" population as the proportion of patients with clinical improvement, defined as a decrease greater or equal to two points on the World Health Organization's (WHO) seven-category ordinal scale by day 28.

resultsAll treatments were safe, and the efficacy outcomes did not differ significantly from those of SOC. Interestingly, in the colchicine group, all participants had an improvement of greater or equal to two points on the WHO seven-category ordinal scale and no deaths or patient deterioration were observed.

conclusionsIxekizumab, colchicine, and IL-2 were demonstrated to be safe but ineffective for COVID-19 treatment. These results must be interpreted cautiously because of the limited sample size.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedColchicineCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentCytokinesHumansInterleukin-17Interleukin-2Pilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Standard of CareTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedColchicineCytokinesInterleukin-17Interleukin-2ixekizumab

Identifiers

PMID37075454
PMCPMC10109354
OpenAlexW4365803980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.