Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37075407›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2023

Appropriate neck circumference and waist-to-height ratio cut-off points as predictors of obesity and cardiovascular risk in adolescents.

Wyllyane Rayana Chaves Carvalho, Ana Karina Teixeira da Cunha França, Alcione Miranda Dos Santos, Luana Lopes Padilha, Eduarda Gomes Bogea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Validity of non-traditional measures of obesity compared to total body fat across the life course: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wyllyane Rayana Chaves CarvalhoUniversidade Federal do Maranhão. Programa de Pós Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Luís, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7704-9951
Ana Karina Teixeira da Cunha FrançaUniversidade Federal do Maranhão. Departamento de Saúde Pública. São Luís, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4460-2631
Alcione Miranda Dos SantosUniversidade Federal do Maranhão. Departamento de Saúde Pública. São Luís, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9711-0182
Luana Lopes PadilhaUniversidade Federal do Maranhão. Programa de Pós Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Luís, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7162-2726
Eduarda Gomes BogeaUniversidade Federal do Maranhão. Programa de Pós Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Luís, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2656-8238
Universidade Federal do Maranhão · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine neck circumference (NC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) cut-off points as predictors of obesity and cardiovascular risk in adolescents.

methodsCross-sectional study developed with a subsample of 634 adolescents aged 18 and 19 years belonging to the third phase of the "RPS" cohort (Ribeirão Preto, Pelotas and São Luís) carried out in 2016. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was identified to assess the predictive capacity of NC and WHtR in relation to the percentage of body fat (%BF), obtained by air displacement plethysmography (ADP), and the cardiovascular risk estimated by the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY).

resultsThe prevalence of obesity by %BF was 7.6% in males and 39.4% in females (p-value <0.001), and the high PDAY risk was 13.8% and 10.9%, respectively. For males, NC cut-off point was 44.0 cm and the AUCs were 0.70 (95%CI 0.58-0.83) to predict obesity and 0.71 (95%CI 0.62-0.80) to predict high cardiovascular risk; for females, NC cut-off point was 40 cm and the AUCs were 0.75 (95%CI 0.69-0.80) and 0.63 (95%CI 0.53-0.73), respectively. WHtR cut-off point was 0.50 for both sexes; for males, the AUCs to predict obesity and high risk according to PDAY were 0.90 (95%CI 0.80-0.99) and 0.73 (95%CI 0.63-0.82), respectively; for females, they were 0.87 (95%CI 0.83-0.90) and 0.55 (95%CI 0.45-0.65), respectively.

conclusionWHtR and NC are good discriminators to assess obesity and cardiovascular risk in adolescents, especially in males.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesNeckPediatric ObesityWaist-Height RatioAdolescentBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID37075407
PMCPMC10118407
OpenAlexW4366602965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.