Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37075394›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2023

Importance of vaccination against human papillomavirus in a rural settlement in Terenos, Mato Grosso do Sul.

Zilda Alves de Souza, Marco Antonio Moreira Puga, Inês Aparecida Tozetti, Marcella Naglis de Oliveira Lima, Milena Sonchine de Souza, Marisa de Fátima Lomba de Farias, Estela Márcia Rondina Scandola, Cacilda Tezelli Junqueira Padovani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Barriers to HPV Vaccination in Brazil: A Systematic Review.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zilda Alves de SouzaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Instituto Integrado de Saúde. Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde da Família. Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1978-5621
Marco Antonio Moreira PugaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Instituto de Biociências. Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-537X
Inês Aparecida TozettiUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Instituto de Biociências. Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3936-8729
Marcella Naglis de Oliveira LimaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde da Família. Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-4253
Milena Sonchine de SouzaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Instituto de Biociências. Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4656-1298
Marisa de Fátima Lomba de FariasUniversidade Federal da Grande Dourados. Faculdade de Ciências Humanas. Dourados, MS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3846-5140
Estela Márcia Rondina ScandolaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde da Família. Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1152-8567
Cacilda Tezelli Junqueira PadovaniUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Instituto de Biociências. Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9418-8168
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal da Grande Dourados · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand health professionals' perceptions about vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) in the Santa Mônica rural settlement in Terenos, Mato Grosso do Sul.

methodsQuantitative and qualitative methodologies, consultations on vaccination cards, records of community health agents and the focus group technique were used. The main factors of hesitation and vaccine refusal were analyzed, as well as the health team's strategies for the process of immunization against HPV, from June to August 2018.

resultsOf 121 children and adolescents, 81 (66.94%) received the complete vaccination schedule. Complete vaccination coverage for women was 73.17% (60/82) and for men, 53.8% (21/39). It was observed that, although strategies are adopted for vaccine promotion, such as mobile actions, the public is resistant due to superficial knowledge about the vaccine and its use in an early age group, showing itself to be susceptible to the negative influence of the media and to society's taboos. In addition, difficulties regarding the use of the Unified Health System card and the shortage of professionals were also observed.

conclusionThe results explain the immunization coverage below the target and reinforce the need to strengthen the family health strategy, as well as the permanent and continuing education of professionals, in order to increase parental confidence and adherence to vaccination.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentBrazilChildFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansImmunization ProgramsMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID37075394
PMCPMC10118412
OpenAlexW4362673863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.