Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37075337›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2023

Evaluation of the properties of WHODAS-12 measurements in individuals with Chagas disease in Brazil.

Patrícia Aparecida Tavares, Cláudia Di Lorenzo Oliveira, Ariela Mota Ferreira, Nayara Ragi Baldoni, Nayara Dornela Quintino, Desiree Sant'Ana Haikal, Ana Luiza Bierrenbach, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Ester Cerdeira Sabino, Clareci Silva Cardoso

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. WHODAS measurement properties for women with dysmenorrhea.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Patrícia Aparecida TavaresUniversidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Grupo de Pesquisas em Epidemiologia e Avaliação de Novas Tecnologias em Saúde UFSJ/CNPq, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3626-5217
Cláudia Di Lorenzo OliveiraUniversidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Grupo de Pesquisas em Epidemiologia e Avaliação de Novas Tecnologias em Saúde UFSJ/CNPq, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8533-8155
Ariela Mota FerreiraUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2315-5318
Nayara Ragi BaldoniUniversidade de Itaúna, Itaúna, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3400-0725
Nayara Dornela QuintinoUniversidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Grupo de Pesquisas em Epidemiologia e Avaliação de Novas Tecnologias em Saúde UFSJ/CNPq, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5740-0310
Desiree Sant'Ana HaikalUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0331-0747
Ana Luiza BierrenbachUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Programa de Pós-Graduação, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6837-0636
Antonio Luiz Pinho RibeiroUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2740-0042
Ester Cerdeira SabinoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2623-5126
Clareci Silva CardosoUniversidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Grupo de Pesquisas em Epidemiologia e Avaliação de Novas Tecnologias em Saúde UFSJ/CNPq, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0689-1644
Federal University of São João del-Rei · BRUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros · BRUniversidade de Itaúna · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

"Sao Paulo-Minas Gerais Center for Chagas Disease Treatment (SaMiTrop)"U01AI168383 · NIAID · FUNDACAO FACULDADE DE MEDICINA · PI Ester Cerdeira Sabino · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
Sao Paulo- MInas Gerais Neglected Tropical Disease Research Center for BiomarkerP50AI098461 · NIAID · FUNDACAO FACULDADE DE MEDICINA · PI SABINO, ESTER CERDEIRA · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS P50 AI098461NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI168383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous tests employed to predict cardiac and functional status are expensive and not widely accessible for a considerable number of patients, particularly those diagnosed with Chagas disease (CD) residing in remote and endemic regions. To date, there is no knowledge of studies that have validated instruments that address functionality in an expanded way, including the biopsychosocial factors in patients with CD. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), in its 12-item shortened version (WHODAS-12) when applied to patients with CD. This is a cross-sectional study of a prospective cohort that follows individuals with CD (SaMi-Trop). Data collection took place between October 2019 and March 2020. In the interviews, sociodemographic information, life habits, clinical information, and indicators of disability measured by WHODAS-12 were collected. Descriptive analysis, internal consistency and construct validity of the instrument were performed. A total of 628 patients with CD were interviewed, most were women (69.5%), their mean age was of 57 years, and most declared an average self-perception of health (43.4%). The 12 items of WHODAS-12 were distributed into three factors, which together account for 61% of the variance. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index was 0.90, indicating adequacy of the sample for factor analysis. The internal consistency of the global scale showed alpha = 0.87. The percentage of incapacity was 16.05%, indicating mild incapacity for the evaluated patients. WHODAS-12 is a valid and reliable measure to assess the disability of the Brazilian population with CD.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseDisability EvaluationBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID37075337
PMCPMC10109441
OpenAlexW4365803813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.