ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2023
Are Neural Network Potentials Trained on Liquid States Transferable to Crystal Nucleation? A Test on Ice Nucleation in the mW Water Model.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Uncertainty in the era of machine learning for atomistic modeling.Digital discovery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural network potentials (NNPs) are increasingly being used to study processes that happen on long time scales. A typical example is crystal nucleation, which rate is controlled by the occurrence of a rare fluctuation, i.e., the appearance of the critical nucleus. Because the properties of this nucleus are far from those of the bulk crystal, it is yet unclear whether NN potentials trained on equilibrium liquid states can accurately describe nucleation processes. So far, nucleation studies on NNPs have been limited to ab initio models whose nucleation properties are unknown, preventing an accurate comparison. Here we train a NN potential on the mW model of water─a classical three-body potential whose nucleation time scale is accessible in standard simulations. We show that a NNP trained only on a small number of liquid state points can reproduce with great accuracy the nucleation rates and free energy barriers of the original model, computed from both spontaneous and biased trajectories, strongly supporting the use of NNPs to study nucleation events.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.