Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37075233›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Web-Based, Interactive, Interest-Based Negotiation Training for Managing Conflict in Isolated Environments: Opportunistic Study With an e-Survey.

Jennifer Fleischer, Jeff Ayton, Maree Riley, Kim Binsted, Devin R Cowan, Abigail M Fellows, Jeff A Weiss, Jay C Buckey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer FleischerSpace Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9536-213X
Jeff AytonAustralian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4012-6719
Maree RileyAustralian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6902-9212
Kim BinstedUniversity of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4580-6166
Devin R CowanSpace Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4621-0559
Abigail M FellowsSpace Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2473-3578
Jeff A WeissMass General Brigham, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9355-3619
Jay C BuckeySpace Medicine Innovations Laboratory, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-4431
Lebanon VA Medical Center · USAustralian Antarctic Division · AUMass General Brigham · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective negotiation in relationships is critical for successful long-duration space missions; inadequate conflict resolution has shown serious consequences. Less desirable forms of negotiation, including positional bargaining (eg, negotiating prices), can exacerbate conflicts. Traditional positional bargaining may work for simple, low-stakes transactions but does not prioritize ongoing relationships. High-stakes situations warrant interest-based negotiation, where parties with competing interests or goals collaborate in a mutually beneficial agreement. This is learnable but must be practiced. Refresher training during conflicts is important to prevent out-of-practice crew members from using less effective negotiation techniques. Training should be self-directed and not involve others because, on a space mission, the only other people available may be part of the conflict.

objectiveWe aimed to develop and test an interactive module teaching principles and skills of interest-based negotiation in a way that users find acceptable, valuable for learning, and enjoyable.

methodsUsing a web-based, interactive-media approach, we scripted, filmed, and programmed an interest-based negotiation interactive training module. In the module, the program mentor introduces users to "The Circle of Value" approach to negotiation and highlights its key concepts through interactive scenarios requiring users to make selections at specific decision points. Each selection prompts feedback designed to reinforce a teaching point or highlight a particular negotiation technique. To evaluate the module, we sought populations experiencing isolation and confinement (an opportunistic design). This included 9 participants in isolated, confined environments in the Australian Antarctic Program and the Hawai'i Space Exploration Analog and Simulation Mars simulation, as well as a subset of people who self-identified as being isolated and confined during the COVID-19 pandemic. Feedback was collected from participants (n=54) through free-response answers and questionnaires with numerical scaling (0=strongly disagree to 4=strongly agree) at the end of the module.

resultsIn total, 51 of 54 (94%) participants found the activity valuable for learning about conflict management (identified by those who selected either "somewhat agree" or "strongly agree"), including 100% of participants in the isolated and confined environment subset (mode=3). In total, 79% (128/162) of participant responses indicated that the module was realistic (mode=3), including 85% (23/27) of responses from participants in isolated and confined environments (mode=3). Most participants felt that this would be particularly valuable for new team members in an isolated, confined environment (46/54, 85% of all participants, mode 4; 7/9, 78% of the isolated and confined environment subset, mode 3) as well as veterans.

conclusionsThis module offers a self-directed, consistent approach to interest-based negotiation training, which is well received by users. Although the data are limited due to the opportunistic study design, the module could be useful for individuals in isolated and confined environments and for anyone involved in high-stakes negotiations where sustaining relationships is essential.

Indexed as

Australiabargainingconfined environmentsconflict managementCOVID-19developmentenvironmentessentialmanagementpandemicskilltrainingusers

Identifiers

PMID37075233
PMCPMC10337338
OpenAlexW4366382045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.