Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37074978›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

The Effects of Expressing Empathy/Autonomy Support Using a COVID-19 Vaccination Chatbot: Experimental Study in a Sample of Belgian Adults.

Wojciech Trzebiński, Toni Claessens, Jeska Buhmann, Aurélie De Waele, Greet Hendrickx, Pierre Van Damme, Walter Daelemans, Karolien Poels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Chatbots and COVID-19: Taking Stock of the Lessons Learned.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wojciech TrzebińskiCollegium of Management and Finance, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Warszawa, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5760-6519
Toni ClaessensDepartment of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9854-8239
Jeska BuhmannDepartment of Linguistics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6659-6247
Aurélie De WaeleDepartment of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8020-1627
Greet HendrickxVaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0099-272X
Pierre Van DammeVaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8642-1249
Walter DaelemansDepartment of Linguistics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9832-7890
Karolien PoelsDepartment of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5276-0293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChatbots are increasingly used to support COVID-19 vaccination programs. Their persuasiveness may depend on the conversation-related context.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate the moderating role of the conversation quality and chatbot expertise cues in the effects of expressing empathy/autonomy support using COVID-19 vaccination chatbots.

methodsThis experiment with 196 Dutch-speaking adults living in Belgium, who engaged in a conversation with a chatbot providing vaccination information, used a 2 (empathy/autonomy support expression: present vs absent) × 2 (chatbot expertise cues: expert endorser vs layperson endorser) between-subject design. Chatbot conversation quality was assessed through actual conversation logs. Perceived user autonomy (PUA), chatbot patronage intention (CPI), and vaccination intention shift (VIS) were measured after the conversation, coded from 1 to 5 (PUA, CPI) and from -5 to 5 (VIS).

resultsThere was a negative interaction effect of chatbot empathy/autonomy support expression and conversation fallback (CF; the percentage of chatbot answers "I do not understand" in a conversation) on PUA (PROCESS macro, model 1, B=-3.358, SE 1.235, t

conclusionsThe findings suggest that expressing empathy/autonomy support using a chatbot may harm its evaluation and persuasiveness when the chatbot fails to answer its users' questions. The paper adds to the literature on vaccination chatbots by exploring the conditional effects of chatbot empathy/autonomy support expression. The results will guide policy makers and chatbot developers dealing with vaccination promotion in designing the way chatbots express their empathy and support for user autonomy.

Indexed as

autonomy supportchatbotchatbot patronage intentionconversational agentCOVID-19digital health interventionempathyhealth promotionperceived user autonomypublic healthvaccination intentionvaccinations

Identifiers

PMID37074978
PMCPMC10173706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.