ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2023
Nonmuscle myosin IIB is a driver of cellular reprogramming.
Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The RNA-binding protein RNP1A is essential and interacts with contractility kit proteins to facilitate cell mechanics.Journal of cell science · 2026Article
- Bioenergetic responses to β-adrenergic stimulation in beige adipocyte depend on actomyosin driven forces.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Nonmuscle myosin 2 turnover in cells is synergistically controlled by the tail and the motor domain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Benefits and challenges of reconstituting the actin cortex.Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nonmuscle myosin IIB (NMIIB) is considered a primary force generator during cell motility. Yet many cell types, including motile cells, do not necessarily express NMIIB. Given the potential of cell engineering for the next wave of technologies, adding back NMIIB could be a strategy for creating supercells with strategically altered cell morphology and motility. However, we wondered what unforeseen consequences could arise from such an approach. Here, we leveraged pancreatic cancer cells, which do not express NMIIB. We generated a series of cells where we added back NMIIB and strategic mutants that increase the ADP-bound time or alter the phosphorylation control of bipolar filament assembly. We characterized the cellular phenotypes and conducted RNA-seq analysis. The addition of NMIIB and the different mutants all have specific consequences for cell morphology, metabolism, cortical tension, mechanoresponsiveness, and gene expression. Major modes of ATP production are shifted, including alterations in spare respiratory capacity and the dependence on glycolysis or oxidative phosphorylation. Several metabolic and growth pathways undergo significant changes in gene expression. This work demonstrates that NMIIB is highly integrated with many cellular systems and simple cell engineering has a profound impact that extends beyond the primary contractile activity presumably being added to the cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.