Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37074672›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2023

Coping with fibromyalgia - a focus group study.

Liat Hamama, Michal Itzhaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liat HamamaSchool of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5498-7443
Michal ItzhakiNursing Department, School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5182-403X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFibromyalgia affects patients' quality of life. Therefore, an essential part of patients' medical management is to develop appropriate coping strategies. This study aimed to obtain a comprehensive picture of patients' cognitive and behavioural strategies to cope with fibromyalgia.

methodsA qualitative design was conducted based on the grounded theory method. Two focus group discussion sessions were held with 15 Israeli women diagnosed with fibromyalgia. A constant comparative analysis method was utilized.

resultsThe findings of themes related to women's coping with fibromyalgia included: Emotional coping, with two categories: (a) from repression and despair to acceptance and completion, and (b) a range of negative and positive emotions; Practical coping, with three categories: (a) the agonizing process of receiving/internalizing the diagnosis, (b) living with the symptoms, and (c) changing lifestyle; Coping with the social environment, with three categories: (a) sharing vs. concealing, (b) social connection-disconnection, and (c) environmental resources. In addition, we identified a theme on the patients' perceptions of the causes of their fibromyalgia that effect their coping, with three categories: (a) demanding lifestyle; (b) traumatic life events; and (c) personality trait-perfectionism.

conclusionIt would be desirable for rheumatology units to have an interdisciplinary professional team to work together with patients to consider how best to manage and effectively cope with their condition.

Indexed as

FibromyalgiaAdaptation, PsychologicalEmotionsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansQuality of Lifeconstant comparative analysiscopingFibromyalgiafocus groupwomen

Identifiers

PMID37074672
PMCPMC10120560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.