ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Imaging Flow Cytometry of Multi-Nuclearity.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of cryopreserved bovine sperm assessment: harnessing imaging flow cytometry for multi-parametric analysis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Pooled it
- Single-cell sequencing in bladder cancer: new insights from tumor cell diversity to individualized treatment strategies.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Flow cytometric analysis of the murine placenta to evaluate nanoparticle platforms during pregnancy.Placenta · 2025Article
- Identification and characterization of planarian multinucleated cells inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-nuclearity is a common feature for cells in different cancers. Also, analysis of multi-nuclearity in cultured cells is widely used for evaluating the toxicity of different drugs. Multi-nuclear cells in cancer and under drug treatments form from aberrations in cell division and/or cytokinesis. These cells are a hallmark of cancer progression, and the abundance of multi-nucleated cells often correlates with poor prognosis.The use of standard bright field or fluorescent microscopy to analyze multi-nuclearity at the quantitative level is laborious and can suffer from user bias. Automated slide-scanning microscopy can eliminate scorer bias and improve data collection. However, this method has limitations, such as insufficient visibility of multiple nuclei in the cells attached to the substrate at low magnification.Since quantification of multi-nuclear cells using microscopic methods might be difficult, imaging flow cytometry (IFC) is a method of choice for this. We describe the experimental protocol for the preparation of the samples of multi-nucleated cells from the attached cultures and the algorithm for the analysis of these cells by IFC. Images of multi-nucleated cells obtained after mitotic arrest induced by taxol, as well as cells obtained after cytokinesis blockade by cytochalasin D treatment, can be acquired at a maximal resolution of IFC. We suggest two algorithms for the discrimination of single-nucleus and multi-nucleated cells. The advantages and disadvantages of IFC analysis of multi-nuclear cells in comparison with microscopy are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.