Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37074525›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2023

Audience immersion: validating attentional and physiological measures against self-report.

Hugo Hammond, Michael Armstrong, Graham A Thomas, Iain D Gilchrist

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
40.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hugo HammondSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK. hugo.hammond@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2411-6924
Michael ArmstrongBritish Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) Research and Development, Saltford, UK.
Graham A ThomasBritish Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) Research and Development, Saltford, UK.
Iain D GilchristSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK.
British Broadcasting Corporation (United Kingdom) · GBAt Bristol · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When an audience member becomes immersed, their attention shifts towards the media and story, and they allocate cognitive resources to represent events and characters. Here, we investigate whether it is possible to measure immersion using continuous behavioural and physiological measures. Using television and film clips, we validated dual-task reaction times, heart rate, and skin conductance against self-reported narrative engagement. We find that reaction times to a secondary task were strongly positively correlated with self-reported immersion: slower reaction times were indicative of greater immersion, particularly emotional engagement. Synchrony in heart rate across participants was associated with self-reported attentional and emotional engagement with the story, although we found no such relationship with skin conductance. These results establish both dual-task reaction times and heart rate as candidate measures for the real-time, continuous, assessment of audience immersion.

Indexed as

AttentionImmersionEmotionsHumansReaction TimeSelf ReportAttentionAudiencesEngagementImmersionMediaNarrative

Identifiers

PMID37074525
PMCPMC10113978
OpenAlexW4366351643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.