ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2023
Automated APACHE II and SOFA score calculation using real-world electronic medical record data in a single center.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Clinical Prediction Model for Short-Term Mortality in Intracerebral Hemorrhage With Thrombocytopenia: A Multicenter Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- First-Day Glycemic Exposure and 28-Day Mortality in the ICU: A Multicohort Study.Research square · 2026Article
- First-Day Glycemic Exposure and 28-Day Mortality in the ICU: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Research square · 2026Article
- External validation of the CALLY index and development of a laboratory-based model for 28-day mortality in sepsis: a two-center study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) in male patients hospitalized for COVID-19.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Differences in Characteristics of Peripartum Patients Who Did and Did Not Require an Upgrade to the Intensive Care Unit: A Propensity Score Matching Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Construction and clinical visualization application of a predictive model for mortality risk in sepsis patients based on an improved machine learning model.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- CDSS score is favorable to ISTH score on outcomes for disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Daily Improvement in APACHE II Score (APACHE/m) and Outcomes in ICU Trauma Patients.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Performance of several clinical scoring systems as predictors of adverse outcomes in acute exposure to toxic alcohols.Toxicology research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of illness severity and organ dysfunction scores into clinical practice, including the APACHE II and SOFA scores, has been challenging due to constraints associated to manual score calculation. With electronic medical records (EMR), score calculation automation using data extraction scripts has emerged as a solution. We aimed to demonstrate that APACHE II and SOFA scores calculated with an automated EMR-based data extraction script predict important clinical endpoints. In this retrospective cohort study, every adult patient admitted to one of our three ICUs, between July 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, were enrolled. For every patient, an automated ICU admission APACHE II score was calculated using EMR data and minimal clinician input. Fully automated daily SOFA scores were calculated for every patient. 4 794 ICU admissions met our selection criteria. Of these ICU admissions, 522 deaths were recorded (10.9% in-hospital mortality rate). The automated APACHE II was discriminant for in-hospital mortality (AU-ROC = 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.85)). We observed an association between the APACHE II score and ICU LOS, with a statistically significant mean increase of 1.1 days of ICU LOS (1.1 [1-1.2]; p = < .0001) for each 10 units increase in APACHE score. SOFA score curves did not discrimate significantly between survivors and non-survivors. A partially automated APACHE II score, calculated with real-world EMR data using an extraction script, is associated with in-hospital mortality risk. The automated APACHE II score could potentially constitute an acceptable surrogate of ICU acuity to be used in resource allocation and triaging, especially in time of high demand for ICU beds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.