ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023
Potential Use of Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease: Take ChatGPT as an Example.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender-Attributed Persona Prompts and the Diagnostic Accuracy of Proprietary and Open-Weight Large Language Models in Chagas Disease and Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Paired Experimental Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing Adverse Event Reporting With Clinical Language Models: Inpatient Falls.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Observational
- Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Infectious Disease Surveillance, Diagnosis, and Prognosis.Viruses · 2025Review
- Article
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Guiding Treatment Decisions for Pediatric Refractive Error.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Proficiency, Clarity, and Objectivity of Large Language Models Versus Specialists' Knowledge on COVID-19's Impacts in Pregnancy: Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Recommended antibiotic treatment agreement between infectious diseases specialists and ChatGPTBMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- A Critical Review of the Prospect of Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Evaluation of a Popular Large Language Model in Orthopedic Literature Review: Comparison to Previously Published Reviews.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Large Language Models in Health Consultations for HIV Patients.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- ChatGPT is an Unreliable Source of Peer-Reviewed Information for Common Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Patient Questions.Advances in orthopedics · 2025Article
- Article
- Capturing pharmacists' perspectives on the value, risks, and applications of ChatGPT in pharmacy practice: A qualitative study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Article
- Let's Have a Chat: How Well Does an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Answer Clinical Infectious Diseases Pharmacotherapy Questions?Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Clinical Practice: An Overview of Gaps, Opportunities, and Limitations.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Review
- Large language model to multimodal large language model: A journey to shape the biological macromolecules to biological sciences and medicine.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024Review
- Large language models and generative AI in telehealth: a responsible use lens.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Review
- ChatGPT and Google Assistant as a Source of Patient Education for Patients With Amblyopia: Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Assessing ChatGPT's Potential in HIV Prevention Communication: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Accuracy, Completeness, and Inclusivity.AIDS and behavior · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past month, a new AI model called Chatbot Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), has received enormous attention in the media and scientific communities due to its ability to process and respond to commands in a humanistic fashion. As reported, five days after its launch, the number of registered users of ChatGPT exceeded one million, and its monthly active users had exceeded 100 million two months later, making it the most rapidly growing consumer application in history. The advent of ChatGPT has further brought about new ideas and challenges in the realm of infectious disease. In view of this, in order to evaluate the potential use of ChatGPT in clinical practice and scientific research of infectious disease, we conducted a brief online survey by using the publicly available ChatGPT webpage. Also, the present study also talks about the relevant social and ethical issues related to this program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.