Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37074449›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023

[Health promotion and prevention in nursing homes in the context of the German Prevention Act].

Gabriele Meyer, Sascha Köpke

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriele MeyerMedizinische Fakultät, Institut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaft, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Deutschland. Gabriele.Meyer@uk-halle.de.
Sascha KöpkeMedizinische Fakultät & Uniklinik Köln, Institut für Pflegewissenschaft, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The German Prevention Act obliges the nursing care insurance funds to provide health-promoting interventions and preventive offers in nursing homes. These interventions should clearly differ from activating nursing care and be of proven effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.The present opinion article critically appraises the evidence base of the interventions belonging to the pre-defined preventive areas "nutrition," "physical activity," "cognitive resources," "psychosocial health," and "prevention of elder abuse." The interventions' underlying evidence is weak or even missing. It is unclear whether the interventions contribute to the intended strengthening of the health-promoting potential of care facilities and meet the goal of improving the health situation and resources of the care-dependent people. On the other hand, there are areas of prevention, which are not covered, but have great potential for improving the life situation of those in need of care, for example, in the context of person-centered care and a caring nursing culture.

Indexed as

Health PromotionNursing HomesAgedCost-Effectiveness AnalysisExerciseGermanyHumansEffectivenessHealth promotionNursing homesOlder agePrevention

Identifiers

PMID37074449
OpenAlexW4366351317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.