ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023
Evaluating the Reproducibility of Amplicon Sequencing Data Derived from Deep-Sea Cold Seep Sediment-Associated Microbiota.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benefiting from the rapid developments and wide applications of high-throughput sequencing, great advancements have been made in investigating microbiota, which are highly diverse and play key roles in both element cycling and the energy flow of ecosystems. There have been inherent limitations of amplicon sequencing that could introduce uncertainty and raise concerns about the accuracy and reproducibility of this technology. However, studies focusing on the reproducibility of amplicon sequencing are limited, especially in characterizing microbial communities in deep-sea sediments. To evaluate reproducibility, 118 deep-sea sediment samples were used for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in technical replicates (repeated measurements of the same sample) that demonstrate the variability of amplicon sequencing. The average occurrence-based overlaps were 35.98% and 27.02% between two and among three technical replicates, respectively, whereas their abundance-based overlaps reached 84.88% and 83.16%, respectively. Although variations of alpha and beta diversity indices were found between/among technical replicates, alpha diversity indices were similar across samples, and the average beta diversity indices were much smaller for technical replicates than among samples. Moreover, clustering methods (i.e., operational taxonomic units [OTUs] and amplicon sequence variants [ASVs]) were shown to have little impact on the alpha and beta diversity patterns of microbial communities. Taken together, although there are variations between/among technical replicates, amplicon sequencing is still a powerful tool with which to reveal diversity patterns of microbiota in deep-sea sediments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.