ArticleActa orthopaedica2023
Health-related quality of life after segmental pedicle screw instrumentation: a matched comparison of patients with neuromuscular and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical complications in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of the last ten years.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Pooled it
- Health-related quality of life in syndromic scoliosis treated by segmental pedicle screw instrumentation: a case-control study.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
- Article
- The Influence of Increased Pedicle Screw Diameter and Thicker Rods on Surgical Results in Adolescents Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeProgressive neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) often requires a long instrumented spinal fusion to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and sitting balance. Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation improves HRQoL in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but data on NMS is limited. We aimed to assess the impact of spinal fusion on HRQoL in NMS patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective case-control study with prospective data collection of NMS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion at a tertiary level hospital in 2009-2021. 2 controls with AIS matched for sex and age were selected for each NMS patient. The Scoliosis Research Society-24 (SRS-24) questionnaire was utilized for pre- and postoperative HRQoL assessment. Follow-up time was a minimum of 2 years.
results60 NMS and 120 AIS patients were included in the analysis, and the mean age (SD) at operation was 14.6 (2.7) in NMS and 15.7 (2.5) in AIS groups. Total SRS score and all domains showed a significant improvement in NMS patients (p < 0.05). Total SRS score improved more (p < 0.001), while pain score improved less (p = 0.04) in NMS (change [95% CI], 0.31 [0.05-0.58] and 0.55 [0.27-0.81]) compared with AIS (0.01 [-0.10 to 0.12] and 0.88 [0.74-1.03]). Postoperative self-image was significantly better in NMS than in AIS at 2-year follow up (p = 0.01). Pelvic instrumentation reduced improvements in the SRS domains.
conclusionHRQoL in NMS patients improved significantly after spinal fusion, and these benefits are comparable to those of AIS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.