Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37073832›Full record

Observational studyEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2023

Epidemiology of intimate partner violence perpetration and victimisation in a representative sample.

Vera Clemens, Jörg M Fegert, Barbara Kavemann, Thomas Meysen, Ute Ziegenhain, Elmar Brähler, Andreas Jud

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vera ClemensDepartment for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-4691
Jörg M FegertDepartment for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Germany.
Barbara KavemannSocial Sciences Research Institute on Gender Issues/FIVE, Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas MeysenInternational Centre for Socio-Legal Studies (SOCLES), Tübingen, Germany.
Ute ZiegenhainDepartment for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Germany.
Elmar BrählerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz DE 39068, Germany.
Andreas JudDepartment for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0135-4196
Universität Ulm · DEInstitute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental Health · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a major global public health problem. Although IPV is known to be frequent and perpetration and victimisation often co-occur, large representative samples assessing both, male and female IPV perpetration and victimisation and overlaps are missing to date. Thus, we aimed to assess victimisation and perpetration and its overlap in physical, sexual, psychological and economic IPV in a representative sample of the German population.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, observational study in Germany from July to October 2021. Using different sampling steps including a random route procedure, a probability sample of the German population was generated. The final sample consisted of 2503 persons (50.2% female, mean age: 49.5 years). Participants were asked about socio-demographic information in a face-to-face interview and experience of physical, psychological, sexual and economic IPV using a questionnaire.

resultsA significant proportion of persons in Germany reporting IPV are both perpetrator and victim for each IPV form. The biggest overlap between perpetration and victimisation was seen for psychological IPV. Major risk factors for IPV perpetration only were male gender and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) while major risk factors for IPV victimisation only comprised of female gender, low household income and ACEs. In the perpetration and victimisation group, gender differences were less significant; older age and lower household income did increase the likelihood of combined perpetration and victimisation.

conclusionsWe have identified a significant overlap of perpetration and victimisation of IPV in the German population for men and women. However, men are at much higher risk to perpetrate IPV without being a victim. Further research and the development of adapted approaches for contexts of overlapping IPV are necessary.

Indexed as

BullyingCrime VictimsIntimate Partner ViolenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsEpidemiologygender differencesrisk factorstraumaviolence

Identifiers

PMID37073832
PMCPMC10130731
OpenAlexW4366352850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.