Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37073780›Full record

ArticleDisability and rehabilitation2024

Daily steps and stepping cadence increase one-year following prosthesis osseointegration in people with lower-limb amputation.

Brecca M M Gaffney, Hope C Davis-Wilson, Mohamed E Awad, James Tracy, Danielle H Melton, Guy Lev, Jason W Stoneback, Cory L Christiansen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brecca M M GaffneyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4556-5868
Hope C Davis-WilsonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5220-5858
Mohamed E AwadDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
James TracyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Danielle H MeltonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Guy LevUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jason W StonebackDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Cory L ChristiansenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3273-1169
University of Colorado Denver · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Hospital · US

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI)UM1TR004399 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI JANINE A HIGGINS, RONALD J. SOKOL · 2023 to 2026
$30.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeople with lower-limb loss participate in less physical activity than able-bodied individuals, which increases the mortality risk and incidence of metabolic syndromes. This study evaluated the effect of lower-limb prosthesis osseointegration on physical activity, including daily steps and stepping cadence.

methodsFree-living walking activity was assessed from 14 patients scheduled to undergo prosthesis osseointegration at two time points (within 2 weeks prior to osseointegration surgery and 12-months following). Daily step count, stepping time, number of walking bouts, average step cadence per bout, maximum step cadence per bout, and time spent in bands of step cadence were compared before and after osseointegration.

resultsTwelve months after prosthesis osseointegration, participants increased daily steps, daily stepping time, average step cadence, and maximum cadence per walking bout compared to pre-osseointegration.

conclusionsParticipants engaged in more daily steps, higher stepping cadence, and longer bouts at higher cadence one year following osseointegration compared to when using a socket prosthesis. As a novel intervention that is becoming more common, it is important to understand walking activity outcomes as these are critical for long-term health.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsAmputation, SurgicalHumansOsseointegrationProsthesis ImplantationWalkingbone-anchored prosthesisdaily stepslower-limb amputationOsseointegrated prosthesesphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID37073780
PMCPMC10584988
OpenAlexW4366351100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.