Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37073525›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2023

Are all forms of defence lost on islands? Persistence of a defensive mutualism in six island colonists from New Zealand.

M Biddick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M BiddickTerrestrial Ecology Research Group, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-5698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The loss of defence hypothesis posits that island colonizers experience a release from predation on the mainland and subsequently lose their defensive adaptations. However, while support for the hypothesis from direct defensive traits is abundant, far less is known about indirect defensive traits. Leaf domatia are cave-like structures produced on the underside of leaves that facilitate an indirect defensive interaction with predaceous and microbivorous mites. I tested the loss of defence hypothesis in six domatia-bearing taxa inhabiting New Zealand and its offshore islands. No support for the loss of defence hypothesis was found. Changes in domatia investment were instead associated with changes in leaf size-a trait that has been repeatedly observed to undergo rapid evolution on islands. Overall results suggest that not all types of defence are lost on islands.

Indexed as

MitesSymbiosisAnimalsIslandsNew ZealandPlant Leavesinsular evolutionisland syndromephyllosphereplant defenceplant–mite mutualismtri-trophic interaction

Identifiers

PMID37073525
PMCPMC10114016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.