ArticleInternational wound journal2023
The biomechanical efficacy of a hybrid support surface in protecting supine patients from sacral pressure ulcers.
Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic versus fixed pillow height systems and cervical muscle function: a randomized crossover trial.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2026Trial
- A Randomised Cross-Over Study to Evaluate the Physiological Effects of Internal Air Pressure Changes in Advanced Support Surface Design.International wound journal · 2025Trial
- Honduran nursing care to pressure injuries in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation: A qualitative study.Belitung nursing journal · 2025Article
- Significant reduction in full-thickness pressure injuries through the quality improvement project that implements alternating pressure air mattresses.International wound journal · 2024Article
- The biomechanical efficacy of a hybrid support surface in protecting supine patients from sacral pressure ulcers.International wound journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Support surfaces are the most important pressure ulcer/injury prevention technology available to clinicians for protecting their at-risk patients. A hybrid support surface marries the benefits of reactive and active support surfaces, by using high-quality foam material inside inflatable air cells. When used in its "static mode", it is a constant low air pressure mattress which delivers pressure redistribution in response to patient bodyweight and movements, by maximising the immersion and envelopment performance of the support surface. When used in its powered "dynamic mode", this system further delivers alternating pressure care via the connected foam and air cells. Modes of action of hybrid support surfaces were never studied quantitatively before, excluding through the limited scope of interface pressure mapping. In this work, we developed a novel computational modelling framework and simulations to visualise and quantify the state of soft tissue loading at the buttocks of a supine patient positioned on a hybrid support surface, in both the static and dynamic modes. We found that the dynamic mode effectively shifts deep concentrated soft tissue loading from under the sacral bone (towards the sacral promontory) to the tip of the sacrum (coccyx) and vice versa, and thereby, generates a deep tissue offloading effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.