ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Health-related Quality of Life Measurement Tools for Lymphedema: A Review of the Literature.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03580109 (Spa Therapy for Upper or Lower Limb Lymphoedema), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Spa Therapy for Upper or Lower Limb Lymphoedema : a Randomized and Comparative Study
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Remotely Delivered Yoga Interventions on Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Selecting a depression measure for research: A critical examination of five common self-report scales.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Review
- [Single-stage treatment of upper limb lymphedema following breast cancer surgery using superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator-based vascularized lymph node transfer combined with lymphaticovenular anastomosis and liposuction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- [Clinical efficacy of vascularized lymph node transfer combined with lymphatico-venous anastomosis in treating unilateral upper limb lymphedema after radical mastectomy for breast cancer].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025Article
- Exercise interventions for the treatment of lower limb lymphoedema after treatment for gynaecological cancers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- The Translation and Cultural Adaptation of LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module to the Indonesian Language.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Quality of Life in Lymphedema Patients Treated by Microsurgical Lymphatic Vessel Transplantation-A Long-Term Follow-Up.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes with at home advanced pneumatic compression treatment of lower extremity lymphedema.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphedema can significantly affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Various quality of life scales have been developed to assess the extent of the disease burden. The purpose of this study is to review various HRQoL instruments that have been used in lymphedema studies and compare their qualities against the COSMIN checklist. Methods: A systematic literature review search was conducted for clinical lymphedema studies published between January 1, 1984, and February 1, 2020, using Pubmed database. All clinical lymphedema studies which used HRQoL instruments as outcome measures were identified. Results: One thousand seventy-six studies were screened-of which, 288 studies were individually assessed. Thirty-nine HRQoL instruments were identified in these clinical lymphedema studies. Of these, there are eight lymphedema-specific questionnaires that cover all HRQoL domains, all of which have been validated for use in lymphedema. We contrasted the two most popular questionnaires [LYMQOL and Upper Limb Lymphedema (ULL)-27] and compared their features. Conclusion: There is currently no ideal lymphedema HRQoL measurement tool available based on the COSMIN criteria. However, our review suggested that LYMQOL and ULL-27 are the most used and most validated instruments at present, but each has their own limitations. We recommend the use of LYMQOL and ULL-27 for future studies to allow direct HRQoL comparison to current literature. Further research is required to develop an optimal HRQoL questionnaire that can ultimately become the gold standard HRQoL instrument for lymphedema.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.