Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37073358›Full record

ReviewMarine life science & technology2022

Shifting chemical defence or novel weapons? A review of defence traits in

Gaoge Wang, Yifei Ren, Shasha Wang, Minglei Hou, Florian Weinberger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine life science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chemical interactions between kelpMarine life science & technology · 2024
    Article
  2. Persistence of Root Exudates ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gaoge WangInstitute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003 China.
Yifei RenInstitute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003 China.
Shasha WangMarine Ecology Division, GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Minglei HouInstitute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003 China.
Florian WeinbergerMarine Ecology Division, GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3366-6880

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seaweed bioinvasions increasingly affect coastal environments around the world, which increases the need for predictive models and mitigation strategies. The biotic interactions between seaweed invaders and invaded communities are often considered a key determinant of invasion success and failure and we here revise the current evidence that the capacity of seaweed invaders to deter enemies in newly reached environments correlates with their invasion success. Particularly efficient chemical defences have been described for several of the more problematic seaweed invaders during the last decades. However, confirmed cases in which seaweed invaders confronted un-adapted enemies in newly gained environments with deterrents that were absent from these environments prior to the invasion (so-called "novel weapons") are scarce, although an increasing number of invasive and non-invasive seaweeds are screened for defence compounds. More evidence exists that seaweeds may adapt defence intensities to changing pressure by biological enemies in newly invaded habitats. However, most of this evidence of shifting defence was gathered with only one particular model seaweed, the Asia-endemic red alga

Indexed as

Agarophyton vermiculophyllumBioinvasionChemical defenceNovel weapons hypothesisShifting defence hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID37073358
PMCPMC10077278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.