Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37073283›Full record

ArticleSynthetic biology (Oxford, England)2023

Robustness and reproducibility of simple and complex synthetic logic circuit designs using a DBTL loop.

Breschine Cummins, Justin Vrana, Robert C Moseley, Hamed Eramian, Anastasia Deckard, Pedro Fontanarrosa, Daniel Bryce, Mark Weston, George Zheng, Joshua Nowak and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synthetic biology (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cyanamide-inducible expression of homing nucleaseSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Special issue: reproducibility in synthetic biology.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Breschine CumminsDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3097-5277
Justin VranaUW BIOFAB, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-0824
Robert C MoseleyDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Hamed EramianNetrias LLC, Annapolis, MD, USA.
Anastasia DeckardGeometric Data Analytics, Inc., Durham, NC, USA.
Pedro FontanarrosaElectrical, Computer & Energy Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0535-2684
Daniel BryceSift, LLC, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Mark WestonNetrias LLC, Annapolis, MD, USA.
George ZhengNetrias LLC, Annapolis, MD, USA.
Joshua NowakStrateos, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Francis C MottaDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Mohammed EslamiNetrias LLC, Annapolis, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5488-1542
Kara Layne JohnsonDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Robert P GoldmanSift, LLC, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5851-4851
Chris J MyersElectrical, Computer & Energy Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Tessa JohnsonGeometric Data Analytics, Inc., Durham, NC, USA.
Matthew W VaughnTexas Advanced Computing Center, Austin, TX, USA.
Niall GaffneyTexas Advanced Computing Center, Austin, TX, USA.
Joshua UrrutiaTexas Advanced Computing Center, Austin, TX, USA.
Shweta GopaulakrishnanTexas Advanced Computing Center, Austin, TX, USA.
Vanessa BiggersStrateos, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Trissha R HigaStrateos, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Lorraine A MosquedaStrateos, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Marcio GameiroDepartment of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2168-0757
Tomáš GedeonDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Konstantin MischaikowDepartment of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jacob BealRaytheon BBN, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-5102
Bryan BartleyRaytheon BBN, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1597-4022
Tom MitchellRaytheon BBN, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tramy T NguyenRaytheon BBN, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nicholas RoehnerRaytheon BBN, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Steven B HaaseDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8127-8992

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational tools addressing various components of design-build-test-learn (DBTL) loops for the construction of synthetic genetic networks exist but do not generally cover the entire DBTL loop. This manuscript introduces an end-to-end sequence of tools that together form a DBTL loop called Design Assemble Round Trip (DART). DART provides rational selection and refinement of genetic parts to construct and test a circuit. Computational support for experimental process, metadata management, standardized data collection and reproducible data analysis is provided via the previously published Round Trip (RT) test-learn loop. The primary focus of this work is on the Design Assemble (DA) part of the tool chain, which improves on previous techniques by screening up to thousands of network topologies for robust performance using a novel robustness score derived from dynamical behavior based on circuit topology only. In addition, novel experimental support software is introduced for the assembly of genetic circuits. A complete design-through-analysis sequence is presented using several OR and NOR circuit designs, with and without structural redundancy, that are implemented in budding yeast. The execution of DART tested the predictions of the design tools, specifically with regard to robust and reproducible performance under different experimental conditions. The data analysis depended on a novel application of machine learning techniques to segment bimodal flow cytometry distributions. Evidence is presented that, in some cases, a more complex build may impart more robustness and reproducibility across experimental conditions.

Indexed as

automated experimentsCRISPRdesign–build–test–learnflow cytometrygenetic circuitsmachine learningSynthetic logic circuitsyeast

Identifiers

PMID37073283
PMCPMC10105856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.