Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37073282›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2023

Development of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Four National Programs Addressing Mother and Child Health in Cote d'Ivoire: Qualitative Analysis of the Emergence and Formulation Process.

Esme Marie Laure Essis, Wambi Maurice Evariste Yaméogo, Olivier Gbènamblo Sossa, Daouda Doukouré, Rachidatou Compaoré, Djoukou Olga Denise Kpebo, Marie Laurette Agbré-Yacé, Joseph Aka, Issiaka Tiembré, Blaise Sondo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Esme Marie Laure EssisNational Institute of Public Health, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire.
Wambi Maurice Evariste YaméogoAfrican Institute of Public Health, Saint Thomas Aquinas University, Saaba, Burkina Faso.
Olivier Gbènamblo SossaDepartment of Economics and Management, Thomas Sankara University, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Daouda DoukouréNational Institute of Public Health, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire.
Rachidatou CompaoréAfrican Institute of Public Health, Saint Thomas Aquinas University, Saaba, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0002-7456-8593
Djoukou Olga Denise KpeboNational Institute of Public Health, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire.
Marie Laurette Agbré-YacéNational Institute of Public Health, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire.
Joseph AkaNational Institute of Public Health, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire.
Issiaka TiembréDepartment of Public Health, Felix Houphouët Boigny University, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire.
Blaise SondoAfrican Institute of Public Health, Saint Thomas Aquinas University, Saaba, Burkina Faso.
Seni KouandaAfrican Institute of Public Health, Saint Thomas Aquinas University, Saaba, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0003-2426-7669

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Monitoring and evaluation were introduced into the management of national health programs to ensure that results were attained, and that donors' funds were used transparently. This study aims to describe the process of the emergence and formulation of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems in national programs addressing maternal and child health in Cote d'Ivoire. Methods: We conducted a multilevel case study combining a qualitative investigation and a literature review. This study took place in the city of Abidjan, where in-depth interviews were conducted with twenty-four (24) former officials who served at the central level of the health system and with six (06) employees from the technical and financial partners' agencies. A total of 31 interviews were conducted from January 10 to April 20, 2020. Data analysis was conducted according to the Kingdon conceptual framework modified by Lemieux and adapted by Ridde. Results: The introduction of M&E in national health programs was due to the will of the technical and financial partners and the political and technical decision-makers at the central level of the national health system, who were concerned with accountability and convincing results in these programs. However, its formulation through a top-down approach was sketchy and lacked content to guide its implementation and future evaluation in the absence of national expertise in M&E. Conclusion: The emergence of M&E systems in national health programs was originally endogenous and exogenous but strongly recommended by donors. Its formulation in the context of limited national expertise was marked by the absence of standards and guidelines that could codify the development of robust M&E systems.

Indexed as

AfricaCote d’Ivoireemergenceformulationhealth programmonitoring and evaluation

Identifiers

PMID37073282
PMCPMC10106087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.