Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37073239›Full record

SynthesisOpen veterinary journal2023

A meta-analysis of the mastitis vaccination efficacy in dairy cattle.

Fernando Mata, Meirielly S Jesus, Ricardo P Pinto, Andreia Mata

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Open veterinary journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando MataCISAS-Centre for Research and Development in Agri-food Systems and Sustainability, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Meirielly S JesusCISAS-Centre for Research and Development in Agri-food Systems and Sustainability, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Ricardo P PintoCISAS-Centre for Research and Development in Agri-food Systems and Sustainability, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Andreia MataDepartment of Biosciences, Faculty of Science, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo · PTDurham University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mastitis is the most important disease in dairy cattle with impact in welfare of animals and the economy of the dairy farming activity. Attempts have been made to produce vaccines to prevent the disease, however, results have been dubious. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the mastitis vaccination in dairy cattle by merging several trials to allow evidence synthesis. Methods: A list of publications with common methodological grounds was selected to allow a quantitative comparison in a meta-analysis with moderators. Results: A mixed methods model ( Conclusion: Full clarification of efficacy is not shown; however, if vaccination is used, must follow a pre-calving protocol. While not showing efficacy, the vaccination has demonstrated a reduction of the severity in clinical cases, rate of culling, and has increased the production of milk and milk solids. Vaccination may improve health and welfare but does not prevent the disease effectively; it must be seen as an additional tool to the traditional preventive measures.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesMastitis, BovineAgricultureAnimalsCattleFemaleMilkVaccinationDairy cow welfareMastitisMeta-analysisVaccination

Identifiers

PMID37073239
PMCPMC10105788
OpenAlexW4321195950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.