Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37073222›Full record

ReviewMarine life science & technology2022

Application of enzymes as a feed additive in aquaculture.

Qingping Liang, Mingxue Yuan, Liping Xu, Elia Lio, Fang Zhang, Haijin Mou, Francesco Secundo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine life science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lipases: An Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Aquaculture nutrition · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qingping LiangCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003 China.
Mingxue YuanCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003 China.
Liping XuCollege of Biology and Geography, Yili Normal University, Yining, 835000 China.
Elia LioIstituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche "Giulio Natta", CNR, Via Mario Bianco n. 9, 20131 Milan, Italy.
Fang ZhangCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003 China.
Haijin MouCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003 China.
Francesco SecundoIstituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche "Giulio Natta", CNR, Via Mario Bianco n. 9, 20131 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern aquaculture must be sustainable in terms of energy consumption, raw materials used, and environmental impact, so alternatives are needed to replace fish feed with other raw materials. Enzyme use in the agri-food industry is based on their efficiency, safety, and protection of the environment, which aligns with the requirements of a resource-saving production system. Enzyme supplementation in fish feed can improve digestibility and absorption of both plant- and animal-derived ingredients, increasing the growth parameters of aquacultural animals. Herein we summarized the recent literature that reported the use of digestive enzymes (amylases, lipases, proteases, cellulases, and hemicellulases) and non-digestive enzymes (phytases, glucose oxidase, and lysozyme) in fish feed. In addition, we analyzed how critical steps of the pelleting process, including microencapsulation and immobilization, can interfere with enzyme activity in the final fish feed product. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42995-022-00128-z.

Indexed as

AquacultureEnzyme microencapsulationEnzymesFeed additiveFish feed

Identifiers

PMID37073222
PMCPMC10077164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.