ArticleCureus2023
Ovarian Fibroma Presents As Uterine Leiomyoma in a 61-Year-Old Female: A Case Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large Ovarian Fibroma With Torsion in a 17-Year-Old Patient: A Report of a Rare Case of Acute Surgical Abdomen.Cureus · 2025Article
- Mucin-Producing Lobular Breast Carcinoma Metastasis to an Ovarian Fibroma: Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Analysis of a Rare Case and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine leiomyoma should be considered when a female patient reports symptoms of abdominal pressure and abnormal vaginal bleeding. However, the symptoms of a uterine leiomyoma are vast and overlap with other possible diseases that are difficult to distinguish even with imaging studies. This is why it is important for physicians and healthcare providers to keep an open mind and have a broad differential diagnosis. In this case study, we present a 61-year-old postmenopausal female patient who presented to the emergency department with complaints of pelvic and abdominal pain, as well as vomiting and diarrhea. She was admitted for observation. A complete blood count (CBC), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), and urinalysis revealed no abnormalities; a pelvic ultrasound and CT scan reported possible adnexal torsion. The patient remained stable and the pain had subsided when she was seen the next morning by her gynecologist (GYN) who discharged her to follow-up in the office. Subsequent examinations that aided in the diagnosis included, but were not limited to pelvic and transvaginal ultrasounds, an abdominal and pelvic CT, and a pelvic MRI. In this case, the MRI revealed an 11-cm mass that could represent a torsioned pedunculated necrotic fibroid originating from the uterus. Radiology recommended surgical removal. Upon removal and review of the pathology of the mass, it was revealed to be a torsioned, partially necrotic fibroma that had originated from the ovary and not from the uterus, as imaging had originally suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.