Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37073101›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2023

Predicting posttraumatic epilepsy using admission electroencephalography after severe traumatic brain injury.

Matthew Pease, Jonathan Elmer, Ameneh Zare Shahabadi, Arka N Mallela, Juan F Ruiz-Rodriguez, Daniel Sexton, Niravkumar Barot, Jorge A Gonzalez-Martinez, Lori Shutter, David O Okonkwo and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Computational Prognostic Modeling in Traumatic Brain Injury.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew PeaseDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6125-9858
Jonathan ElmerDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ameneh Zare ShahabadiDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Arka N MallelaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0993-198X
Juan F Ruiz-RodriguezDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Daniel SextonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Niravkumar BarotDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jorge A Gonzalez-MartinezDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lori ShutterDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
David O OkonkwoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
James F CastellanoDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · USDuke University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

NINDS Research Education Programs for Residents and Fellows in NeurosurgeryR25NS065731 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FECCI, PETER, HASAN, DAVID M. · 2009 to 2023
$968k
NINDS Research Education Programs for Residents and Fellows in NeurosurgeryUE5NS065731 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FECCI, PETER, HASAN, DAVID M. · 2024 to 2024
$0k
NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS065731NINDS NIH HHS UE5 NS065731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePosttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) develops in as many as one third of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients, often years after injury. Analysis of early electroencephalographic (EEG) features, by both standardized visual interpretation (viEEG) and quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis, may aid early identification of patients at high risk for PTE.

methodsWe performed a case-control study using a prospective database of severe TBI patients treated at a single center from 2011 to 2018. We identified patients who survived 2 years postinjury and matched patients with PTE to those without using age and admission Glasgow Coma Scale score. A neuropsychologist recorded outcomes at 1 year using the Expanded Glasgow Outcomes Scale (GOSE). All patients underwent continuous EEG for 3-5 days. A board-certified epileptologist, blinded to outcomes, described viEEG features using standardized descriptions. We extracted 14 qEEG features from an early 5-min epoch, described them using qualitative statistics, then developed two multivariable models to predict long-term risk of PTE (random forest and logistic regression).

resultsWe identified 27 patients with and 35 without PTE. GOSE scores were similar at 1 year (p = .93). The median time to onset of PTE was 7.2 months posttrauma (interquartile range = 2.2-22.2 months). None of the viEEG features was different between the groups. On qEEG, the PTE cohort had higher spectral power in the delta frequencies, more power variance in the delta and theta frequencies, and higher peak envelope (all p < .01). Using random forest, combining qEEG and clinical features produced an area under the curve of .76. Using logistic regression, increases in the delta:theta power ratio (odds ratio [OR] = 1.3, p < .01) and peak envelope (OR = 1.1, p < .01) predicted risk for PTE. SIGNIFICANCE: In a cohort of severe TBI patients, acute phase EEG features may predict PTE. Predictive models, as applied to this study, may help identify patients at high risk for PTE, assist early clinical management, and guide patient selection for clinical trials.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticEpilepsy, Post-TraumaticCase-Control StudiesElectroencephalographyGlasgow Coma ScaleHumanselectroencephalographyepilepsyposttraumatic epilepsyseizurestraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID37073101
PMCPMC11293840
OpenAlexW4366351118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.