Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072854›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

Effects of an asymmetrical high flow nasal cannula interface in hypoxemic patients.

Douglas Slobod, Elena Spinelli, Stefania Crotti, Alfredo Lissoni, Alessandro Galazzi, Giacomo Grasselli, Tommaso Mauri

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06204276 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Physiologic Effects of Asymmetrical Versus Conventional High-flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Respiratory Failure. A Randomized Crossover Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSiriraj HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsAcute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureArmsExperimental: Asymmetrical high-flow nasal cannula, Active comparator: Conventional high-flow nasal cannula
NCT06301035 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Asymmetric High-flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and Standard HFNC in Post Extubation High-risk Group: A Prospective, Single-center, Open-labeled, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsung Medical CenterRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsAcute Respiratory FailureArmsAsymmetric High flow nasal cannula, Standard(symmetric) High flow nasal cannula
NCT06521489 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Study of Asymmetrical High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation (HFNCO) vs Standard HFNCO on Cardiac Surgical Patients Postoperatively

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensRan2024 to 2026Enrolled63ConditionsHypoxemic Respiratory FailureArmsAsymmetrical High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation, Conventional High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation
NCT06674629 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of an Asymmetrical High Flow Nasal Cannula Interface on End-Expiratory Lung Impedance

TypeobservationalSponsorArgentinian Intensive Care SocietyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled17ConditionsEnd-Expiratory Lung Impedance, Respiratory Rate, Diaphragm Thickness Fraction, Diaphragm ExcursionArmsHigh flow oxygen therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical review of non-invasive ventilation.The European respiratory journal · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Douglas SlobodDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Elena SpinelliDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Stefania CrottiDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Alfredo LissoniDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro GalazziDepartment of Healthcare Professions, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giacomo GrasselliDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Tommaso MauriDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy. tommaso.mauri@unimi.it.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal noninvasive respiratory support for patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure should minimize work of breathing without increasing the transpulmonary pressure. Recently, an asymmetrical high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) interface (Duet, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd), in which the caliber of each nasal prong is different, was approved for clinical use. This system might reduce work of breathing by lowering minute ventilation and improving respiratory mechanics.

methodsWe enrolled 10 patients ≥ 18 years of age who were admitted to the Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico ICU in Milan, Italy, and had a PaO

resultsApplication of the asymmetrical interface resulted in a -13.5 [-19.4 to (-4.5)] % change in minute ventilation at a flow rate of 40 l/min, p = 0.006 and a -19.6 [-28.0 to (-7.5)] % change at 60 l/min, p = 0.002, that occurred despite no change in PaCO

conclusionsAn asymmetrical HFNC interface reduces minute ventilation and work of breathing in patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemic respiratory failure supported with a conventional interface. This appears to be primarily driven by increased ventilatory efficiency due to enhanced CO

Indexed as

Noninvasive VentilationRespiratory InsufficiencyCannulaHumansLungOxygen Inhalation TherapyRespiratory MechanicsAsymmetrical interfaceElectrical impedance tomographyEsophageal pressure monitoringHigh flow nasal cannulaHypoxemic respiratory failureVentilatory efficiency

Identifiers

PMID37072854
PMCPMC10111067
OpenAlexW4366289324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.