Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072823›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2023

Satisfaction analysis of overground gait exoskeletons in people with neurological pathology. a systematic review.

C Cumplido-Trasmonte, F Molina-Rueda, G Puyuelo-Quintana, A Plaza-Flores, M Hernández-Melero, E Barquín-Santos, M A Destarac-Eguizabal, E García-Armada

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C Cumplido-TrasmonteCentre for Automation and Robotics (CAR), CSIC-UPM, Ctra Campo Real km 0.2 - La Poveda- Arganda del Rey, Madrid, 28500, Spain. carlos.cumplido@marsibionics.com.
F Molina-RuedaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.
G Puyuelo-QuintanaInternational Doctoral School, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, 28922, Spain.
A Plaza-FloresCentre for Automation and Robotics (CAR), CSIC-UPM, Ctra Campo Real km 0.2 - La Poveda- Arganda del Rey, Madrid, 28500, Spain.
M Hernández-MeleroCentre for Automation and Robotics (CAR), CSIC-UPM, Ctra Campo Real km 0.2 - La Poveda- Arganda del Rey, Madrid, 28500, Spain.
E Barquín-SantosMarsi Bionics S.L., Madrid, Spain.
M A Destarac-EguizabalMarsi Bionics S.L., Madrid, Spain.
E García-ArmadaCentre for Automation and Robotics (CAR), CSIC-UPM, Ctra Campo Real km 0.2 - La Poveda- Arganda del Rey, Madrid, 28500, Spain. elena.garcia@csic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople diagnosed with neurological pathology may experience gait disorders that affect their quality of life. In recent years, research has been carried out on a variety of exoskeletons in this population. However, the satisfaction perceived by the users of these devices is not known. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to evaluate the satisfaction perceived by users with neurological pathology (patients and professionals) after the use of overground exoskeletons.

methodsA systematic search of five electronic databases was conducted. In order to be included in this review for further analysis, the studies had to meet the following criteria: [1] the study population was people diagnosed with neurological pathology; [2] the exoskeletons had to be overground and attachable to the lower limbs; and [3]: the studies were to include measures assessing either patient or therapist satisfaction with the exoskeletons.

resultsTwenty-three articles were selected, of which nineteen were considered clinical trials. Participants diagnosed with stroke (n = 165), spinal cord injury (SCI) (n = 102) and multiple sclerosis (MS) (n = 68). Fourteen different overground exoskeleton models were analysed. Fourteen different methods of assessing patient satisfaction with the devices were found, and three ways to evaluate it in therapists.

conclusionUsers' satisfaction with gait overground exoskeletons in stroke, SCI and MS seems to show positive results in safety, efficacy and comfort of the devices. However, the worst rated aspects and therefore those that should be optimized from the users' point of view are ease of adjustment, size and weight, and ease of use.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceSpinal Cord InjuriesStrokeGaitHumansPersonal SatisfactionQuality of LifeNeurologyOverground exoskeletonRehabilitationSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37072823
PMCPMC10111693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.