Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072806›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2023

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation dissemination and integration with organ preservation in the USA: ethical and logistical considerations.

Tamar Schiff, Christian Koziatek, Erin Pomerantz, Nichole Bosson, Robert Montgomery, Brendan Parent, Stephen P Wall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Willing to Donate? A Quantitative and Thematic Analysis of Attitudes to Deceased Organ Donation in Different Circumstances.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tamar SchiffDepartment of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, 227 E 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Christian KoziatekRonald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Erin PomerantzLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nichole BossonLos Angeles County EMS Agency, Santa Fe Springs, CA, USA.
Robert MontgomeryNYU Langone Transplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Brendan ParentDepartment of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, 227 E 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Stephen P WallDepartment of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, 227 E 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA. stephen.wall@nyulangone.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, termed eCPR, offers the prospect of improving survival with good neurological function after cardiac arrest. After death, ECMO can also be used for enhanced preservation of abdominal and thoracic organs, designated normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), before organ recovery for transplantation. To optimize resuscitation and transplantation outcomes, healthcare networks in Portugal and Italy have developed cardiac arrest protocols that integrate use of eCPR with NRP. Similar dissemination of eCPR and its integration with NRP in the USA raise novel ethical issues due to a non-nationalized health system and an opt-in framework for organ donation, as well as other legal and cultural factors. Nonetheless, eCPR investigations are ongoing, and both eCPR and NRP are selectively employed in clinical practice. This paper delineates the most pressing relevant ethical considerations and proposes recommendations for implementation of protocols that aim to promote public trust and reduce conflicts of interest. Transparent policies should rely on protocols that separate lifesaving from organ preservation considerations; robust, centralized eCPR data to inform equitable and evidence-based allocations; uniform practices concerning clinical decision-making and resource utilization; and partnership with community stakeholders, allowing patients to make decisions about emergency care that align with their values. Proactively addressing these ethical and logistical challenges could enable eCPR dissemination and integration with NRP protocols in the USA, with the potential to maximize lives saved through both improved resuscitation with good neurological outcomes and increased organ donation opportunities when resuscitation is unsuccessful or not in accordance with individuals' wishes.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestTissue and Organ ProcurementHumansOrgan PreservationRetrospective StudiesBioethicsCardiopulmonary resuscitationExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationOrgan donationOrgan preservation

Identifiers

PMID37072806
PMCPMC10111746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.