Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072799›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Urate-lowering therapy following a treat-to-target continuation strategy compared to a treat-to-avoid-symptoms discontinuation strategy in gout patients in remission (GO TEST Finale): study protocol of a multicentre pragmatic randomized superiority trial.

Iris Rose Peeters, Alfons A den Broeder, William J Taylor, Nathan den Broeder, Marcel Flendrie, Noortje van Herwaarden

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Iris Rose PeetersDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands. i.peeters@maartenskliniek.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7991-6112
Alfons A den BroederDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands.
William J TaylorDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand.
Nathan den BroederDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands.
Marcel FlendrieDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands.
Noortje van HerwaardenDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLSint Maartenskliniek · NLUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

ZonMw: Zorgevaluatie & Gepast Gebruik (ZE&GG)-extra ronde 2019 10330022010003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term gout treatment is based on reducing serum urate levels using urate-lowering therapy (ULT). Most guidelines recommend using a lifelong continuation treat-to-target (T2T) strategy, in which ULT is dosed or combined until a serum urate target has been reached and maintained. However, a frequently used alternative strategy in clinical practice is a treat-to-avoid-symptoms (T2S) ULT discontinuation strategy, with the possibility of restarting the medication. This latter strategy aims at an acceptable symptom state, regardless of serum urate levels. High-quality evidence to support either strategy for patients in prolonged remission while using ULT is lacking.

methodsWe developed an investigator-driven pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, randomized, superiority treatment strategy trial (GO TEST Finale). At least 278 gout patients using ULT who are in remission (>12 months, preliminary gout remission criteria) will be randomized 1:1 to a continued T2T strategy (treatment target serum urate < 0.36 mmol/l) or switched to a T2S discontinuation strategy in which ULT is tapered to stop and restarted in case of (persistent or recurrent) flaring. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in the proportion of patients not in remission during the last 6 months of 24 months follow-up and will be analyzed using a two proportion z test. Secondary outcomes are group differences in gout flare incidence, reintroduction or adaptation of ULT, use of anti-inflammatory drugs, serum urate changes, occurrence of adverse events (with a special interest in cardiovascular and renal events), and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first clinical trial comparing two ULT treatment strategies in patients with gout in remission. It will contribute to more specific and unambiguous guideline recommendations and improved cost-effectiveness of long-term gout treatment. It also paves the way (exploratory) to individualized long-term ULT treatment. In this article, we elaborate on some of our trial design choices and their clinical and methodological consequences.

trial registrationInternational Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) NL9245. Registered on 2 February 2021 (METC Oost-Nederland NL74350.091.20); EudraCT EUCTR2020-005730-15-NL. Registered on 11 January 2021.

Indexed as

GoutEquivalence Trials as TopicGout SuppressantsHumansKidneyMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSymptom Flare UpUric AcidGout SuppressantsUric AcidGoutRandomized clinical trialRemissionTreat-to-avoid-symptoms strategyTreat-to-target strategyUrate-lowering therapy

Identifiers

PMID37072799
PMCPMC10114395
OpenAlexW4366332547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.