ArticleNeurology and therapy2023
Optimizing The Timing of Stereotactic Minimally Invasive Drainage for Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative Rebleeding: The Sword of Damocles in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIntracerebral hemorrhage is a high-risk pathological event that is associated with formidable morality rates. Here, our objective was to perform a retrospective study to determine the best timing for drainage using physiological data on patients who received drainage at different timings.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed 198 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage who underwent stereotactic drainage at the conventional timing (surgery within 12 h of admission; control group) and 216 patients who underwent stereotactic drainage at a customized surgical timing (elective group). Follow-ups were performed at 3 and 6 months after surgery.
resultsThe clinical indicators, including prognosis, hematoma clearance, recurrent hemorrhage, intracerebral infection, pulmonary infection, deep venous thrombosis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, and matrix metallopeptidase 2 and 9 levels, were compared between the control and elective groups. Our data indicated that the elective group had significantly better prognosis compared to the control group (p = 0.021), with a higher rate of hematoma clearance (p = 0.004) and a lower rate of recurrent hemorrhage (p = 0.018). The total occurrence rate of post-surgery complications was also lower for the elective group (p = 0.026). NIHSS scores and serum MMP2/9 levels of the elective group were lower than those of the control group.
conclusionsCustomized timing of stereotactic drainage may be superior to conventional fixed timing (within 12 h post-hemorrhage) in reducing post-surgery complications and promoting recovery, which supports the potential use of customized timing of stereotactic minimally invasive drainage as a new convention in clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.