ArticleBrain tumor pathology2023
Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural review of six cases previously diagnosed as null cell PitNETs.
Article in Brain tumor pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emergence of NEC features in corticotroph PitNETs: primary tumor, radiation-induced transformation, or metastasis?Brain tumor pathology · 2026Article
- Article
- Cell Lineage-Specific Differences in Clinical Behavior of Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenomas.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Double PitNETs: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Practical approaches to diagnosing PitNETs/adenomas based on cell lineage.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Pathological characteristics of reoperated regrowing clinically nonfunctioning pituitary tumor cases in comparison with initial surgical cases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- FROM 'NULL CELL ADENOMA' TO REFINED DIAGNOSIS: PITFALLS IN PITUITARY MASS EVALUATION.Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) lacking lineage affiliation are termed "null cell" PitNETs (NCTs). NCTs are characterized as being immunonegative for pituitary hormones as well as transcription factors. We analyzed the ultrastructure and immunohistochemistry of six hormone-negative and transcription factor (TPIT, PIT1, SF1)-negative PitNETs, with less than 1% immunoreactive cells. Histologically, three cases presented a perivascular pattern and pseudorosettes; the other three showed a solid pattern with oncocytic changes. Electron microscopic examination revealed poorly differentiated tumor cells with sparsely scattered secretory granules and intracellular organelles in all null cell tumors when compared with hormone-positive PitNETs. Two cases harbored a honeycomb Golgi (HG) structure, and three oncocytic tumors showed mitochondrial accumulation. The two HG cases were immunopositive for newly obtained TPIT (CL6251) and showed some adrenocorticotropic hormone-positive cells, while the remaining four were diffusely immunopositive for GATA3, with two SF1-positive cases identified in subsequent immunostaining. Thus, these six cases may be classified as two sparsely granulated corticotroph PitNETs, two gonadotroph PitNETs with SF1 re-staining, and two likely gonadotroph PitNETs with GATA3 immunostaining. No "true NCT" was detected among 1071 PitNETs, demonstrating the importance of precise diagnosis following the most recent criteria to improve therapeutic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.