Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072622›Full record

ArticleJournal of human genetics2023

Recontact: a survey of current practices and BRCA1/2 testing in Japan.

Tomohiro Sakaguchi, Tomoharu Tokutomi, Akiko Yoshida, Kayono Yamamoto, Keiko Obata, Daniele Carrieri, Susan E Kelly, Akimune Fukushima

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tomohiro SakaguchiGenetic Counseling Program, Applied Medical Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Iwate Medical University, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate, 020-8505, Japan.
Tomoharu TokutomiDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Iwate Medical University, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate, 020-8505, Japan. tktmtmhr@iwate-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3001-9936
Akiko YoshidaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Iwate Medical University, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate, 020-8505, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9531-8008
Kayono YamamotoDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Iwate Medical University, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate, 020-8505, Japan.
Keiko ObataDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Iwate Medical University, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate, 020-8505, Japan.
Daniele CarrieriMedical School, University of Exeter, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Susan E KellyEgenis, The Centre for the Study of Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter, EX4 4PY, UK.
Akimune FukushimaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Iwate Medical University, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate, 020-8505, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing advances have enabled the provision of previously unavailable information on the pathogenicity of genetic variants, frequently necessitating the recontact of former patients by clinicians. In Japan, national health insurance coverage was extended to BRCA1/2 testing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer for patients who meet certain criteria in 2020, and conditions necessitating recontact were expected to increase. Studies and discussions regarding recontact have been conducted in the U.S. and Europe; however, in Japan, the national discussion around recontact remains undeveloped. We conducted a cross-sectional study by interviewing 73 facilities accredited by the Japanese Organization of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer regarding the practice of recontacting patients at these facilities. Sixty-six facilities responded that they recontact patients, but only 17 facilities had a protocol for this. The most common reason for recontact was that it could benefit the patient. Facilities that did not recontact stated that they lacked the necessary personnel or services. Most facilities indicated that a recontact system should be implemented in their practice. The increased burden on too few medical personnel, unestablished systems, patient confusion, and the right not to know were cited as barriers to implementing recontact. Although developing recommendations on recontact would be useful for providing equitable healthcare in Japan, there is an urgent need to deepen the discussion on recontacting, as negative opinions about recontacting patients were observed.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic TestingOvarian NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansJapanSurveys and QuestionnairesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.