Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072563›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2023

Predicting Glass-Forming Ability of Pharmaceutical Compounds by Using Machine Learning Technologies.

Junhuang Jiang, Defang Ouyang, Robert O Williams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junhuang JiangDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712, USA.
Defang OuyangState Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences (ICMS), University of Macau, Macau, 999078, China.
Robert O WilliamsDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712, USA. bill.williams@austin.utexas.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low aqueous solubility is a common and serious challenge for most drug substances not only in development but also in the market, and it may cause low absorption and bioavailability as a result. Amorphization is an intermolecular modification strategy to address the issue by breaking the crystal lattice and enhancing the energy state. However, due to the physicochemical properties of the amorphous state, drugs are thermodynamically unstable and tend to recrystallize over time. Glass-forming ability (GFA) is an experimental method to evaluate the forming and stability of glass formed by crystallization tendency. Machine learning (ML) is an emerging technique widely applied in pharmaceutical sciences. In this study, we successfully developed multiple ML models (i.e., random forest (RF), XGBoost, and support vector machine (SVM)) to predict GFA from 171 drug molecules. Two different molecular representation methods (i.e., 2D descriptor and Extended-connectivity fingerprints (ECFP)) were implemented to process the drug molecules. Among all ML algorithms, 2D-RF performed best with the highest accuracy, AUC, and F1 of 0.857, 0.850, and 0.828, respectively, in the testing set. In addition, we conducted a feature importance analysis, and the results mostly agreed with the literature, which demonstrated the interpretability of the model. Most importantly, our study showed great potential for developing amorphous drugs by in silico screening of stable glass formers.

Indexed as

WaterCrystallizationPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical PreparationsWateramorphous drugsArtificial intelligenceGlass-forming abilitymachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.