ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023
Frontline Clinician Appraisement of Research Engagement: "I feel out of touch with research".
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Setting the rules of engagement: a qualitative study of challenges and enablers of engaged research in a South African emergency care system.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Who is the emergency care community? A qualitative exploration of stakeholder roles and relationships in engaged research within a South African provincial emergency care system.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026Article
- A vision for an academic health science centre: A survey of research engagement and barriers.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Bridging Voice and Swallowing: A Qualitative Study on Speech-Language Pathologist Perspectives of Integrated Therapy.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Article
- Between Necessity and Feasibility: A Qualitative Study on How Clinicians Navigate Bedside Voice Assessment.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Article
- Increasing research capacity in Canadian community hospitals: an intrinsic descriptive case study.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Engaging primary care professionals in OECD's international PaRIS survey: a documentary analysis.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Letter to the Editor: Frontline Clinician Appraisement of Research Engagement: "I Feel Out of Touch with Research".Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- How surgical Trainee Research Collaboratives achieve success: a mixed methods study to develop trainee engagement strategies.BMJ open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth services research can benefit from frontline clinician input across all stages of research, yet their key perspectives are often not meaningfully engaged.
objectiveHow can we improve clinician engagement in research?
designConvenience sampling and semi-structured interviews followed by descriptive content analysis with an inductive approach, followed by group participatory listening sessions with interviewees to further contextualize findings.
participantsTwenty-one multidisciplinary clinicians from one healthcare system. KEY
resultsWe identified two major themes: perceptions of research (how research fits within job role) and characterizing effective engagement (what works and what does not work in frontline clinician engagement). "Perceptions of Research" encompassed three subthemes: prior research experience; desired degree of engagement; and benefits to clinicians engaging in research. "Characterizing Effective Engagement" had these subthemes: engagement barriers; engagement facilitators; and impact of clinician's racial identity.
conclusionsInvesting in frontline clinicians as research collaborators is beneficial to clinicians themselves, the health systems that employ them, and those for which they care. Yet, there are multiple barriers to meaningful engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.