Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072475›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

DNMT1 mutant ants develop normally but have disrupted oogenesis.

Iryna Ivasyk, Leonora Olivos-Cisneros, Stephany Valdés-Rodríguez, Marie Droual, Hosung Jang, Robert J Schmitz, Daniel J C Kronauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. ZooKeys · 2024
    Article
  11. Neuromodulators and neuroepigenetics of social behavior in ants.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Iryna IvasykLaboratory of Social Evolution and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA. iivasyk@rockefeller.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7693-9546
Leonora Olivos-CisnerosLaboratory of Social Evolution and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Stephany Valdés-RodríguezLaboratory of Social Evolution and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Marie DroualLaboratory of Social Evolution and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Hosung JangDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Robert J SchmitzDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7538-6663
Daniel J C KronauerLaboratory of Social Evolution and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA. dkronauer@rockefeller.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4103-7729
Rockefeller University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering MST ProgramT32GM007739 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI HSU, KATHARINE C · 1985 to 2023
$51.1M
The Molecular Underpinnings of Complex Social BehaviorR35GM127007 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI KRONAUER, DANIEL · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute Faculty Scholar AwardHoward Hughes Medical Institute Investigator AwardNIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127007NIGMS NIH HHS R35GM127007NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007739NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although DNA methylation is an important gene regulatory mechanism in mammals, its function in arthropods remains poorly understood. Studies in eusocial insects have argued for its role in caste development by regulating gene expression and splicing. However, such findings are not always consistent across studies, and have therefore remained controversial. Here we use CRISPR/Cas9 to mutate the maintenance DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 in the clonal raider ant, Ooceraea biroi. Mutants have greatly reduced DNA methylation, but no obvious developmental phenotypes, demonstrating that, unlike mammals, ants can undergo normal development without DNMT1 or DNA methylation. Additionally, we find no evidence of DNA methylation regulating caste development. However, mutants are sterile, whereas in wild-type ants, DNMT1 is localized to the ovaries and maternally provisioned into nascent oocytes. This supports the idea that DNMT1 plays a crucial but unknown role in the insect germline.

Indexed as

AntsAnimalsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferase 1DNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA MethylationGene Expression RegulationMammalsOocytesOogenesisDNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferase 1DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID37072475
PMCPMC10113331
OpenAlexW4366283481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.