Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072391›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2023

Subtypes in addiction and their neurobehavioral profiles across three functional domains.

Gunner Drossel, Leyla R Brucar, Eric Rawls, Timothy J Hendrickson, Anna Zilverstand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mouse parasubthalamicbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gunner DrosselGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Leyla R BrucarDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5852-3088
Eric RawlsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Timothy J HendricksonUniversity of Minnesota Informatics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Anna ZilverstandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. annaz@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4889-9700

Funding

NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHT32DA007234 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Paul G Mermelstein, Jocelyn M Richard · 1986 to 2026
$10.9M
Using Computation to Achieve Breakthroughs in NeuroscienceT32MH115886 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007234NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rates of return to use in addiction treatment remain high. We argue that the development of improved treatment options will require advanced understanding of individual heterogeneity in Substance Use Disorders (SUDs). We hypothesized that considerable individual differences exist in the three functional domains underlying addiction-approach-related behavior, executive function, and negative emotionality. We included N = 593 participants from the enhanced Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample community sample (ages 18-59, 67% female) that included N = 420 Controls and N = 173 with past SUDs [54% female; N = 75 Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) only, N = 30 Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) only, and N = 68 Multiple SUDs]. To test our a priori hypothesis that distinct neuro-behavioral subtypes exist within individuals with past SUDs, we conducted a latent profile analysis with all available phenotypic data as input (74 subscales from 18 measures), and then characterized resting-state brain function for each discovered subtype. Three subtypes with distinct neurobehavioral profiles were recovered (p < 0.05, Cohen's D: 0.4-2.8): a "Reward type" with higher approach-related behavior (N = 69); a "Cognitive type" with lower executive function (N = 70); and a "Relief type" with high negative emotionality (N = 34). For those in the Reward type, substance use mapped onto resting-state connectivity in the Value/Reward, Ventral-Frontoparietal and Salience networks; for the Cognitive type in the Auditory, Parietal Association, Frontoparietal and Salience networks; and for the Relief type in the Parietal Association, Higher Visual and Salience networks (p

Indexed as

AlcoholismBehavior, AddictiveSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentAdultExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37072391
PMCPMC10113211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.