Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072389›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

The value of ecosystem services in global marine kelp forests.

Aaron M Eger, Ezequiel M Marzinelli, Rodrigo Beas-Luna, Caitlin O Blain, Laura K Blamey, Jarrett E K Byrnes, Paul E Carnell, Chang Geun Choi, Margot Hessing-Lewis, Kwang Young Kim and 9 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Historical data reveal extirpation of foundation species and kelp forest community deborealization in a coastal hotspot.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Aaron M EgerSchool of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2033, Australia. aaron.eger@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0687-7340
Ezequiel M MarzinelliThe University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rodrigo Beas-LunaUniversidad Autónoma de Baja California, Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Ensenada, BC, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7266-3394
Caitlin O BlainLeigh Marine Laboratory, Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Laura K BlameyCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Environment, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3713-091X
Jarrett E K ByrnesDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, 20125, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9791-9472
Paul E CarnellSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Queenscliff, VIC, 3225, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6747-1366
Chang Geun ChoiDepartment of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5353-5541
Margot Hessing-LewisHakai Institute, Quadra Island, Canada.
Kwang Young KimDepartment of Oceanography, College of Natural Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186, Korea.
Naoki H KumagaiCenter for Climate Change Adaptation, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1144-4339
Julio LordaUniversidad Autónoma de Baja California, Facultad de Ciencias, Ensenada, BC, Mexico & The Tijuana River National Estuarine Research Reserve, Imperial Beach, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4293-7518
Pippa MooreSchool of Life Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3DA, UK.
Yohei NakamuraGraduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Kochi University, 200 Monobe, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8502, Japan.
Alejandro Pérez-MatusSubtidal Ecology Laboratory (Subelab), Estación Costera de Investigaciones Marinas (ECIM), Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla, 114-D, Santiago, Chile.
Ondine PontierHakai Institute, Quadra Island, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-0576
Dan SmaleMarine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4157-541X
Peter D SteinbergSchool of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2033, Australia.
Adriana VergésSchool of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2033, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3507-1234

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S032827/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While marine kelp forests have provided valuable ecosystem services for millennia, the global ecological and economic value of those services is largely unresolved. Kelp forests are diminishing in many regions worldwide, and efforts to manage these ecosystems are hindered without accurate estimates of the value of the services that kelp forests provide to human societies. Here, we present a global estimate of the ecological and economic potential of three key ecosystem services - fisheries production, nutrient cycling, and carbon removal provided by six major forest forming kelp genera (Ecklonia, Laminaria, Lessonia, Macrocystis, Nereocystis, and Saccharina). Each of these genera creates a potential value of between $64,400 and $147,100/hectare each year. Collectively, they generate between $465 and $562 billion/year worldwide, with an average of $500 billion. These values are primarily driven by fisheries production (mean $29,900, 904 Kg/Ha/year) and nitrogen removal ($73,800, 657 Kg N/Ha/year), though kelp forests are also estimated to sequester 4.91 megatons of carbon from the atmosphere/year highlighting their potential as blue carbon systems for climate change mitigation. These findings highlight the ecological and economic value of kelp forests to society and will facilitate better informed marine management and conservation decisions.

Indexed as

EcosystemKelpCarbonClimate ChangeForestsHumansCarbon

Identifiers

PMID37072389
PMCPMC10113392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.