Article in Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Thiviya SelvanathanFrom the Department of Pediatrics (T.S., V.C., S.P.M.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (M.G.), Faculty of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (H.M.B.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto; Department of Pediatrics (E.N.K.), Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (S.P.M.), BC Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3288-2434
Mireille GuillotFrom the Department of Pediatrics (T.S., V.C., S.P.M.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (M.G.), Faculty of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (H.M.B.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto; Department of Pediatrics (E.N.K.), Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (S.P.M.), BC Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2079-9505
Helen M BransonFrom the Department of Pediatrics (T.S., V.C., S.P.M.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (M.G.), Faculty of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (H.M.B.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto; Department of Pediatrics (E.N.K.), Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (S.P.M.), BC Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Vann ChauFrom the Department of Pediatrics (T.S., V.C., S.P.M.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (M.G.), Faculty of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (H.M.B.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto; Department of Pediatrics (E.N.K.), Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (S.P.M.), BC Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8260-8738
Edmond N KellyFrom the Department of Pediatrics (T.S., V.C., S.P.M.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (M.G.), Faculty of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (H.M.B.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto; Department of Pediatrics (E.N.K.), Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (S.P.M.), BC Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0271-4720
Steven P MillerFrom the Department of Pediatrics (T.S., V.C., S.P.M.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (M.G.), Faculty of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (H.M.B.), The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto; Department of Pediatrics (E.N.K.), Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, ON Department of Pediatrics (S.P.M.), BC Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. steven.miller@cw.bc.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9102-9105
Hospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Malformations of cortical development (MCD) are a rare group of disorders with heterogeneous clinical, neuroimaging, and genetic features. MCD consist of disruptions in the development of the cerebral cortex secondary to genetic, metabolic, infectious, or vascular etiologies. MCD are typically classified by stage of disrupted cortical development as secondary to abnormal: (1) neuronal proliferation or apoptosis, (2) neuronal migration, or (3) postmigrational cortical development. MCD are typically detected with brain MRI when an infant or child becomes symptomatic, presenting with seizures, developmental delay, or cerebral palsy. With recent advances in neuroimaging, cortical malformations can be detected using ultrasound or MRI during the fetal period or in the neonatal period. Of interest, preterm infants are born at a time when many cortical developmental processes are still occurring. However, there is a paucity of literature describing the neonatal imaging findings, clinical presentation, and evolution over time of cortical malformations in preterm infants. In this study, we present the neuroimaging findings from early life to term-equivalent age and childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes of an infant born very preterm (<32 weeks' postmenstrual age) with MCD detected incidentally on neonatal research brain MRI. These brain MRIs were performed as part of a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 160 very preterm infants; MCD were detected incidentally in 2 infants.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Child Neurology: Cortical Malformations in Preterm Infants: Case From a Prospective Cohort. · full record | OpenQuestion