Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072204›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2023

Redesigning primary care: Provider perspectives on the clinical utility of virtual visits.

Jamie K Fujioka, Megan Nguyen, Michelle Phung, Onil Bhattacharyya, Leah Kelley, Vess Stamenova, Nike Onabajo, Michael Kidd, Laura Desveaux, Ivy Wong and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The remains of a pandemic.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  6. Impact of virtual visits on primary care physician work flows.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jamie K FujiokaResearch coordinator at Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (WIHV) in Toronto, Ont.
Megan NguyenStrategist at Throughline Strategy Inc in Toronto.
Michelle PhungProgram manager at the Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & Imaging at Stanford University School of Medicine in Palo Alto, CA.
Onil BhattacharyyaFrigon Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research and Director of WIHV. He is Lead at the Centre for Digital Health Evaluation in Toronto. He practises family medicine and is Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine and the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (DFCM) at the University of Toronto (U of T). He is national Co-chair of the Primary and Integrated Health Care Innovations Network and has been a Harkness Fellow in Health Care Policy and Practice at the Commonwealth Fund in New York, NY, and a Takemi Fellow at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, MA.
Leah KelleyGraduate of the U of T Faculty of Law.
Vess StamenovaResearch lead at WIHV.
Nike OnabajoProject manager at North York Ontario Health Teams in Toronto.
Michael KiddPrincipal Medical Advisor and Deputy Chief Medical Officer with the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Professor of Primary Care Reform at the Australian National University in Canberra, and Adjunct Professor in the DFCM at U of T.
Laura DesveauxScientific Lead and Learning Health System Program Lead at Trillium Health Partners in Toronto.
Ivy WongDirector of Ontario Health Team and Transformation at North York General Hospital and Backbone Lead of North York Toronto Health Partners Ontario Health Team.
R Sacha BhatiaSenior Vice President of Population Health and Value Based Care at Ontario Health and a cardiologist at the University Health Network in Toronto.
Payal AgarwalPractising family physician affiliated with the DFCM at U of T and Innovation Fellow at WIHV.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore primary care physician (PCP) perspectives on the clinical utility of virtual visits.

designQualitative design involving semistructured interviews.

settingPrimary care practices within 5 regions in southern Ontario.

participantsPrimary care physicians representing different practice sizes and remuneration models.

methodsInterviews were conducted with PCPs who were involved in a large-scale pilot implementation of virtual visits (patient-provider asynchronous messaging, or synchronous audio or video communication). The first phase involved a convenience sample of users in the first 2 regions where the pilot was initiated; after implementation in all 5 regions, purposive sampling was used to ensure diversity within the sample (eg, physicians representing different use frequencies of virtual visits, regions, and remuneration models). Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed. An inductive thematic analysis was used to identify prominent themes and subthemes. MAIN

findingsTwenty-six physicians were interviewed. Fifteen were recruited using convenience sampling and 11 through purposive sampling. Four themes regarding the clinical utility of virtual visits were identified: virtual visits can effectively resolve many patient concerns, with some variation in PCP comfort using virtual visits for specific conditions; virtual visits are beneficial for a range of patients but some patients might overuse or inappropriately use them; PCPs prefer to use asynchronous messaging (eg, text or online messaging) because of its convenience and flexibility; and virtual visits can provide value at the patient, provider, and health system levels.

conclusionWhile participants believed that virtual visits can be appropriately used to resolve a variety of clinical concerns, they found in practice that virtual visits are fundamentally different from face-to-face encounters. Professional guidelines on appropriate use cases should be established to develop a standard framework for virtual care.

Indexed as

PhysiciansPrimary Health CareHumansOntarioQualitative ResearchResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID37072204
PMCPMC10112733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.