Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072186›Full record

ArticleGenome research2023

Density separation of petrous bone powders for optimized ancient DNA yields.

Daniel M Fernandes, Kendra A Sirak, Olivia Cheronet, Mario Novak, Florian Brück, Evelyn Zelger, Alejandro Llanos-Lizcano, Anna Wagner, Anna Zettl, Kirsten Mandl and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 9 countries.

Daniel M FernandesDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria; ron.pinhasi@univie.ac.at daniel.fernandes@univie.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-7434-6552
Kendra A SirakDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Olivia CheronetDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6760-1204
Mario NovakCentre for Applied Bioanthropology, Institute for Anthropological Research, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-4567-8742
Florian BrückDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Evelyn ZelgerDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Alejandro Llanos-LizcanoDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7579-3573
Anna WagnerDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Anna ZettlDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Kirsten MandlDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Kellie Sara Duffet CarlsonDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Victoria OberreiterDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Kadir T ÖzdoğanDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Susanna SawyerDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Francesco La PastinaDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, United Kingdom.
Emanuela BorgiaDipartimento di Scienze dell'Antichità, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome 00185, Italy.
Alfredo CoppaDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Miroslav DobešInstitute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 118 00, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5327-5030
Petr VelemínskýDepartment of Anthropology, National Museum, Prague 115 79, Czech Republic.
David ReichDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Lynne S BellCentre for Forensic Research, School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada.
Ron PinhasiDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria; ron.pinhasi@univie.ac.at daniel.fernandes@univie.ac.at.
University of Vienna · ATHarvard University · USCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Archaeology, Prague · CZInstitute for Anthropological Research · HRNational Museum · CZSapienza University of Rome · ITSimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF M 3108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Density separation is a process routinely used to segregate minerals, organic matter, and even microplastics, from soils and sediments. Here we apply density separation to archaeological bone powders before DNA extraction to increase endogenous DNA recovery relative to a standard control extraction of the same powders. Using nontoxic heavy liquid solutions, we separated powders from the petrous bones of 10 individuals of similar archaeological preservation into eight density intervals (2.15 to 2.45 g/cm

Indexed as

DNA, AncientPetrous BoneDNAHumansPlasticsPowdersDNADNA, AncientPlasticsPowders

Identifiers

PMID37072186
PMCPMC10234301
OpenAlexW4366248967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.