Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072174›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2023

Effect of Reverberation on Neural Responses to Natural Speech in Rabbit Auditory Midbrain: No Evidence for a Neural Dereverberation Mechanism.

Oded Barzelay, Stephen David, Bertrand Delgutte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Recurrent Circuits Amplify Corticofugal Signals and Drive Feedforward Inhibition in the Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oded BarzelayEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA 02114-3096 odedbarz@gmail.com bertrand_delgutte@meei.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4855-9519
Stephen DavidOregon Research Hearing Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-3104
Bertrand DelgutteEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA 02114-3096 odedbarz@gmail.com bertrand_delgutte@meei.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1349-9608
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

NEURAL CODING OF SPEECHR01DC002258 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI DELGUTTE, BERTRAND · 1995 to 2022
$8.0M
Tools for modeling state-dependent sensory encoding by neural populations across spatial and temporal scalesR01EB028155 · NIBIB · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID, STEPHEN V, MESGARANI, NIMA · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028155NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverberation is ubiquitous in everyday acoustic environments. It degrades both binaural cues and the envelope modulations of sounds and thus can impair speech perception. Still, both humans and animals can accurately perceive reverberant stimuli in most everyday settings. Previous neurophysiological and perceptual studies have suggested the existence of neural mechanisms that partially compensate for the effects of reverberation. However, these studies were limited by their use of either highly simplified stimuli or rudimentary reverberation simulations. To further characterize how reverberant stimuli are processed by the auditory system, we recorded single-unit (SU) and multiunit (MU) activity from the inferior colliculus (IC) of unanesthetized rabbits in response to natural speech utterances presented with no reverberation ("dry") and in various degrees of simulated reverberation (direct-to-reverberant energy ratios (DRRs) ranging from 9.4 to -8.2 dB). Linear stimulus reconstruction techniques (Mesgarani et al., 2009) were used to quantify the amount of speech information available in the responses of neural ensembles. We found that high-quality spectrogram reconstructions could be obtained for dry speech and in moderate reverberation from ensembles of 25 units. However, spectrogram reconstruction quality deteriorated in severe reverberation for both MUs and SUs such that the neural degradation paralleled the degradation in the stimulus spectrogram. Furthermore, spectrograms reconstructed from responses to reverberant stimuli resembled spectrograms of reverberant speech better than spectrograms of dry speech. Overall, the results provide no evidence for a dereverberation mechanism in neural responses from the rabbit IC when studied with linear reconstruction techniques.

Indexed as

Inferior ColliculiSound LocalizationSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAnimalsHumansRabbitsSoundSpeech Intelligibility

Identifiers

PMID37072174
PMCPMC10179871
OpenAlexW4366336760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.