Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37072171›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2024

In-house homologous recombination deficiency testing in ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional Italian pilot study.

Francesco Pepe, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Matteo Fassan, Nicola Fusco, Davide Vacirca, Alberto Ranghiero, Konstantinos Venetis, Alessandra Rappa, Sergio Vincenzo Taormina, Gianluca Russo and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Deep learning algorithm on H&E whole slide images to characterizeComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Francesco PepeDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Elena Guerini-RoccoDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Matteo FassanDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology & Cytopathology Unit, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Nicola FuscoDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-9131
Davide VacircaDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Alberto RanghieroDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Konstantinos VenetisDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra RappaDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Sergio Vincenzo TaorminaDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca RussoDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2698-9470
Elena RebellatoDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology & Cytopathology Unit, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Giada MunariIstituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Andrea Moreno-ManuelMolecular Oncology Laboratory, Fundación Investigación Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-2505
Carmine De AngelisDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Claudio ZamagniUnit of Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giorgio ValabregaDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino at Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Umberto MalapelleDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy umberto.malapelle@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3211-9957
Giancarlo TronconeDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1630-5805
Massimo Barberis *Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0943-4804
Antonino Iaccarino *Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPIs) represent a standard of care for the clinical management of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The recognition of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has emerged as a predictive biomarker of response for first-line PARPIs treatment in patients with HGOSC. On the other hand, this test is extremely complex and therefore it is often externalised. Regrettably, the reliability of outsourced HRD testing can be troubled by inconclusive results and high rejection rates. In this methodological study, we assessed the technical feasibility, interassay and interlaboratory reproducibility of in-house HRD testing using three different commercially available next-generation sequencing assays.

methodsA total of n=20 epithelial ovarian cancer samples previously analysed with MyChoice CDx were subjected to HRD retesting using three different platforms in three different major pathology laboratories, that is, SOPHiA DDM HRD Solution, HRD focus and Oncomine homologous recombination repair pathway predesigned panel. Concordance was calculated by Cohen's (dual) and Fleiss (triple) κ coefficients.

resultsIn-house

conclusionsIn-house testing for HRD can be reliably performed with commercially available next-generation sequencing assays.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHomologous RecombinationOvarian NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFeasibility StudiesFemaleGenetic TestingHumansItalyPilot ProjectsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitorsovarian neoplasmspathology, molecularpoint-of-care testing

Identifiers

PMID37072171
PMCPMC11228191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.