ReviewRespiratory care2023
Respiratory Mechanics: Revisiting the Appraisement of Lung Recruitment.
Review in Respiratory care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation has long been recognized as the most vital therapy for patients with ARDS. Compared with lung-protective ventilation, debates that involve the open lung strategy, which consists primarily of the lung recruitment maneuver and higher PEEP, have never been resolved. In terms of the beneficial and detrimental effects of this aggressive maneuver, appraisal of lung recruitment is essential for intensivists to make clinical decisions. This review aimed to clarify how to assess the potential for lung recruitment based on respiratory mechanics when using the pressure-volume curve or loop method and end-expiratory lung volume-static compliance of the respiratory system method. However, their limitations related to excessive generalization, accuracy, and identification of cutoff values cannot be omitted. Finally, future studies are warranted to combine these classic methods with newly invented techniques to achieve safer and more effective lung recruitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.