Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071827›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2023

Optimized OPEP Force Field for Simulation of Crowded Protein Solutions.

Stepan Timr, Simone Melchionna, Philippe Derreumaux, Fabio Sterpone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bridging Scales: Coarse-Grained Protein Models in Computational Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. GRAMMCell: Docking-based Cell Modeling Resource.Journal of molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stepan TimrLaboratoire de Biochimie Théorique (UPR 9080), CNRS, Université de Paris, 13 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5824-4476
Simone MelchionnaIAC-CNR, Via dei Taurini 19, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Philippe DerreumauxLaboratoire de Biochimie Théorique (UPR 9080), CNRS, Université de Paris, 13 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9110-5585
Fabio SterponeLaboratoire de Biochimie Théorique (UPR 9080), CNRS, Université de Paris, 13 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0894-8069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macromolecular crowding has profound effects on the mobility of proteins, with strong implications on the rates of intracellular processes. To describe the dynamics of crowded environments, detailed molecular models are needed, capturing the structures and interactions arising in the crowded system. In this work, we present OPEPv7, which is a coarse-grained force field at amino-acid resolution, suited for rigid-body simulations of the structure and dynamics of crowded solutions formed by globular proteins. Using the OPEP protein model as a starting point, we have refined the intermolecular interactions to match the experimentally observed dynamical slowdown caused by crowding. The resulting force field successfully reproduces the diffusion slowdown in homogeneous and heterogeneous protein solutions at different crowding conditions. Coupled with the lattice Boltzmann technique, it allows the study of dynamical phenomena in protein assemblies and opens the way for the in silico rheology of protein solutions.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsComputer SimulationSolutionsProteinsSolutions

Identifiers

PMID37071827
PMCPMC10150358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.