Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071812›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2023

Standardized perioperative management in acute abdominal surgery: Swedish SMASH controlled study.

Terje J Timan, Ove Karlsson, Ninni Sernert, Mattias Prytz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06731296 (Characteristics of General Surgery Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, Villavicencio, 2022-2024.), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06731296 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Characteristics of General Surgery Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, Villavicencio, 2022-2024.

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Departamental de VillavicencioRan2026 to 2029Enrolled1,000ConditionsCritical Illness, Postoperative ComplicationsArmsPresence of a risk factor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Terje J TimanUniversity of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ove KarlssonUniversity of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ninni SernertUniversity of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mattias PrytzUniversity of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden.
NU Hospital Group · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

Research and DevelopmentW&M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute high-risk abdominal surgery is common, as are the attendant risks of organ failure, need for intensive care, mortality, or long hospital stay. This study assessed the implementation of standardized management.

methodsA prospective study of all adults undergoing emergency laparotomy over an interval of 42 months (2018-2021) was undertaken; outcomes were compared with those of a retrospective control group. A new standardized clinical protocol was activated for all patients including: prompt bedside physical assessment by the surgeon and anaesthetist, interprofessional communication regarding location of resuscitation, elimination of unnecessary factors that might delay surgery, improved operating theatre competence, regular epidural, enhanced recovery care, and frequent early warning scores. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were duration of hospital stay, need for intensive care, and surgical complications.

resultsA total of 1344 patients were included, 663 in the control group and 681 in the intervention group. The use of antibiotics increased (81.4 versus 94.7 per cent), and the time from the decision to operate to the start of surgery was reduced (3.80 versus 3.22 h) with use of the new protocol. Fewer anastomoses were performed (22.5 versus 16.8 per cent). The 30-day mortality rate was 14.5 per cent in the historical control group and 10.7 per cent in the intervention group (P = 0.045). The mean duration of hospital (11.9 versus 10.2 days; P = 0.007) and ICU (5.40 versus 3.12 days; P = 0.007) stays was also reduced. The rate of serious surgical complications (grade IIIb-V) was lower (37.6 versus 27.3 per cent; P = <0.001).

conclusionStandardized management protocols improved outcomes after emergency laparotomy.

Indexed as

Critical CareLaparotomyAdultHumansLength of StayProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSweden

Identifiers

PMID37071812
PMCPMC10364510
OpenAlexW4366336771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.