Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37071731›Full record

SynthesisToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2023

Weight of evidence for cross-species conservation of androgen receptor-based biological activity.

Sara M F Vliet, Kristan J Markey, Scott G Lynn, Anna Adetona, Dawn Fallacara, Patricia Ceger, Neepa Choksi, Agnes L Karmaus, AtLee Watson, Andrew Ewans and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prioritising research on endocrine disruption in the marine environment: a global perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara M F VlietU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Scientific Computing and Data Curation Division, Duluth, Minnesota 55811, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7429-0771
Kristan J MarkeyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Endocrine Disrupter Screening Program, Washington, District of Columbia 20460, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3911-2969
Scott G LynnU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Endocrine Disrupter Screening Program, Washington, District of Columbia 20460, USA.
Anna AdetonaBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio 43201, USA.
Dawn FallacaraBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio 43201, USA.
Patricia CegerInotiv, Morrisville, North Carolina 27560, USA.
Neepa ChoksiInotiv, Morrisville, North Carolina 27560, USA.
Agnes L KarmausInotiv, Morrisville, North Carolina 27560, USA.
AtLee WatsonInotiv, Morrisville, North Carolina 27560, USA.
Andrew EwansInotiv, Morrisville, North Carolina 27560, USA.
Amber B DanielInotiv, Morrisville, North Carolina 27560, USA.
Jonathan HammInotiv, Morrisville, North Carolina 27560, USA.
Kelsey VitenseU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Scientific Computing and Data Curation Division, Duluth, Minnesota 55811, USA.
Kaitlyn A WolfOak Ridge Associated Universities, Duluth, Minnesota 55804, USA.
Amy ThomasBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio 43201, USA.
Carlie A LaLoneU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, Minnesota 55804, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USBattelle · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · US

Funding

EPA 68HERH20D0003Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) is tasked with assessing chemicals for their potential to perturb endocrine pathways, including those controlled by androgen receptor (AR). To address challenges associated with traditional testing strategies, EDSP is considering in vitro high-throughput screening assays to screen and prioritize chemicals more efficiently. The ability of these assays to accurately reflect chemical interactions in nonmammalian species remains uncertain. Therefore, a goal of the EDSP is to evaluate how broadly results can be extrapolated across taxa. To assess the cross-species conservation of AR-modulated pathways, computational analyses and systematic literature review approaches were used to conduct a comprehensive analysis of existing in silico, in vitro, and in vivo data. First, molecular target conservation was assessed across 585 diverse species based on the structural similarity of ARs. These results indicate that ARs are conserved across vertebrates and are predicted to share similarly susceptibility to chemicals that interact with the human AR. Systematic analysis of over 5000 published manuscripts was used to compile in vitro and in vivo cross-species toxicity data. Assessment of in vitro data indicates conservation of responses occurs across vertebrate ARs, with potential differences in sensitivity. Similarly, in vivo data indicate strong conservation of the AR signaling pathways across vertebrate species, although sensitivity may vary. Overall, this study demonstrates a framework for utilizing bioinformatics and existing data to build weight of evidence for cross-species extrapolation and provides a technical basis for extrapolating hAR-based data to prioritize hazard in nonmammalian vertebrate species.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsReceptors, AndrogenAnimalsEndocrine SystemHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyEndocrine DisruptorsReceptors, Androgenandrogen receptorcross-species extrapolationendocrine disrupting chemicalsliterature reviewweight of evidence

Identifiers

PMID37071731
PMCPMC10796108
OpenAlexW4366251734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.